Morphological analysis in word recognition.

Number 898
Year 1992
Drawer 16
Entry Date 07/15/1998
Authors Feldman, Laurie B. and Andjelkovic, Darinka.
Contact
Publication Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, edited by R. Frost and L. Katz. Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V. pp. 343-361.
url http://www.haskins.yale.edu/Reprints/HL0898.pdf
Abstract One of the most refined techniques for investigating morphological processing in word recognition is the variant of the lexical decision task known as repetition priming (Stanners, Neiser, Hernon & Hall 1979). It provides a primary source of evidence, according to Henderson (1989), of facilitation between words formed from the same morpheme (i.e., morphological relatives). Generally, target (second presentation) decision latencies and err rates are reduced in the context of morphologically related primes (first presentation). Words related to the target (e.g., HEALS) can be forms that are unaffixed (e.g., HEAL), inflected (e.g., HEALED) or derived (e.g., HEALER) in either the same or different modalities (e.g., print or speech) and they can be separated by as many as fifty intervening items. Effects of morphological relatedness have been observed in the lexical decision task across a variety of languages including Serbo-Croatian (Feldman & Fowler, 1987) and Hebrew (Bentin & Feldman, 1990), English (Fowler, Napps, & Feldman, 1985; Feldman, 1991) and American Sign Language (Hanson & Feldman, 1991; see also Emmorey, 1989).
Notes

Search Publications