Calling a mirage a mirage: direct perception of speech produced without a tongue.

Number 737
Year 1990
Drawer 13
Entry Date 11/15/1999
Authors Fowler, C. A.
Contact
Publication Journal of Phonetics, 18, 529-541.
url http://www.haskins.yale.edu/Reprints/HL0737.pdf
Abstract Addresses E. C. Morrish's (see PA, Vol 78:29976) contention that the compensatory articulations of a speaker without a tongue disconfirm a direct-realist theory of speech perception. Listeners' successful identifications of the speaker's utterances and their mistaken identifications pattern in ways that suggest to Morrish that listeners perceive acoustic signals, not their articulatory causes. The interpretation is inconsistent with other evidence in speech perception and with interpretations of analogous situations (mirages) in visual perception. Morrish argues that the better performance of listeners identifying the speaker's intended words in connected speech than in isolation reveals the central role of top-down processes in speech perception. Morrish fails to show that the top-down influences are on perception, rather than on judgment.
Notes

Search Publications