Did Orthographies Evolve?
| Number | 528 |
|---|---|
| Year | 1985 |
| Drawer | 9 |
| Entry Date | 11/18/1999 |
| Authors | Mattingly, I. G. |
| Contact | |
| Publication | Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), 18-23. |
| url | http://www.haskins.yale.edu/Reprints/HL0528.pdf |
| Abstract | According to I. Gelb (A Study of Writing, 2nd edition, Chicago: U of Chicago Press, 1963), writing has "evolved" from picture writing to logography to syllabic writing to alphabetic writing. It is argued here that this widely accepted theory of orthographic evolution does not accurately fit the historical facts, & that the variety of orthographies is better explained on linguistic grounds. Orthographies have to be productive, & they can manage this only by providing devices for transcribing the possible words in the lexicon. The very limited number of different ways in which this is accomplished in different orthographies is accounted for by the structural peculiarities of the languages that the orthographies transcribe. |
| Notes |
Search Publications