| Abstract | [Introduction]
In response to Tallal’s critical comments on our paper (Katz, Healy & Shankweiler, 1983), we will review the findings that suggest that deficiencies in using a phonetic memory strategy underlie the inferior order memory of children with reading disability. We will then examine the alternative explanations of the order memory deficits suggested by Tallal, which, it will be seen, do not prove satisfactory. |
|---|
