Realism and unrealism: A reply.

Number 451
Year 1984
Drawer 8
Entry Date 11/19/1999
Authors Fowler, C. A.
Contact
Publication Journal of Phonetics, 11, 303-322.
url http://www.haskins.yale.edu/Reprints/HL0451.pdf
Abstract A recent article by Hammarberg (1982) criticizes my theoretical perspective on coarticulation as both “internally” and “externally incoherent”. A major source of incoherence, in Hammarberg’s view, is the alleged claim that phonetic segments are physical entities, and hence, not mental entities. The present paper ascribes the incoherence largely to Hammarberg’s understanding of the perspective, pointing out that entities can be at once psychological (“mental”) and physical. More usefully, perhaps, the article attempts to establish the philosophical, theoretical and practical grounds on which Hammarberg’s own viewpoint and mine disagree most importantly. It is argued that the disagreements are substantial (mirroring, in part, those recently expressed between Fodor and Phylyshyn (1981) and Turvey et al. (1981), and that their analysis may lead to more careful development of both theoretical perspectives; this should, in turn, promote a deeper understanding of speech itself.
Notes

Search Publications