haskins logo
Staff Talk Archive
Nov. 17, 2009
12:30 pm
 
  DONALD SHANKWEILER (Haskins Laboratories)
"Building the Supramodal Language Brain"
Nov. 12, 2009
12:30 pm
 
  ROBERT FRANK (Yale University)
"Statistical learning and mental grammar: Prospects fot a new paradigm?"
Noiv. 5, 2009
12:30 pm
  JANA BRUNNER (MIT):
"Relationship between auditory acuity and the use of motor equivalence in production of the sibilant 'sh' "

Abstract

Relationship between auditory acuity and the use of motor equivalence in production of the sibilant “sh”.
J. Brunner, S. Ghosh, P. Hoole, M. Matthies, M. Tiede & J. Perkell

Motor-equivalent trading relations (i.e. different articulations with essentially the same acoustic output) reflect strategies for compensating for perturbations. Previous studies have shown that some speakers use motor equivalence but others do not. In the present study we test the hypothesis that the use of these strategies is linked to the speakers' auditory acuity: Speakers with high auditory acuity will use motor equivalence to a greater extent and concomitantly produce clearer phoneme contrasts than low acuity speakers.

In a first experiment, seven speakers were recorded via electromagnetic articulography while adapting over the course of two weeks to an articulatory perturbation consisting of an artificial palate. Motor equivalence in production of the sibilant “sh”, i.e., more lip protrusion when the tongue tip is fronted and less if it is retracted, was found for five of the seven speakers but not for the remaining two.

In a second experiment, the speakers' auditory acuity was assessed by testing their ability to hear small differences along a synthetic s-sh continuum. The results indicate that higher-acuity speakers used motor equivalence to a greater extent when adapting to a perturbation than lower-acuity speakers. Additionally, higher-acuity speakers produced greater acoustic contrasts than lower-acuity speakers.

Speech rate had an influence on the use of motor equivalence: slow speakers used motor equivalence to a lesser degree than fast speakers.

Oct. 29, 2009
12:30 pm  
  VICTOR KUPERMAN (Stanford University):
"Production and Comprehension of Discontinuous Syntactic Dependences"
Oct. 23, 2009 (Friiday)
12:30 pm
 
  Xavier Pelorson & Annemie Van Hirtusm
Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble
"Aeroacoustic Aspects of Voiced Sounds and Fricatives"
Oct. 15, 2009
12:30 PM
  CLINT JOHNS (Haskins Laboratories):
"An ERP investigation of memory accessibility and coreferential processing"

Abstract:

Coreferential processing is thought to be modulated by an antecedent’s accessibility in a comprehender’s discourse model. Many theories of coreferential processing suggest that an antecedent’s availability as a referent is the result of being in linguistic focus, as when an entity is mentioned first or most frequently in a discourse, or when an entity occupies a prominent position in a sentence’s syntactic structure. However, it may also be possible to enhance an entity’s referential accessibility by virtue of domain-general principles of memory (such as primacy, frequency, or levels-of-processing effects) without appealing to higher-level linguistic operations such as syntactic processing. Because these memory and language effects are typically confounded, the question of whether referential accessibility may be attributed to non-linguistic rather than linguistic processes has never been directly tested. The current study used both event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral measures in a series of experiments in order to investigate the effects of linguistic and non-linguistic focus on coreference. We examined this question against the backdrop of a well-known finding in the coreferential processing literature, the repeated name penalty (Gordon, Grosz, & Gilliom, 1993); this penalty results when an entity that is prominent in a sentence’s syntactic structure is referred to by a repeated name anaphor. By using a generation task (analogous to a levels-of-processing manipulation) we modulated antecedent accessibility without altering the entity’s status in sentence/discourse structure. Experiment 1 showed that, while both generation and syntactic focus improved recognition memory performance, only the syntactic manipulation elicited online discourse processing effects – an N400 effect, the electrophysiological correlate of the repeated name penalty (Swaab, Camblin & Gordon, 2004). When syntactically-enhanced access was removed as a factor in Experiment 2, generation interacted with repetition in the offline recognition memory for antecedent names, while no discourse processing consequences in the ERP waveforms were evident. In Experiment 3, memory enhancement by means of generation and repetition was examined for proper names in word lists. Lexical repetition effects (reduced N400 and increased LPC amplitudes) were found regardless of generation condition; however, repetition and generation elicited different patterns of recognition memory performance. These results suggest that general memory enhancement alone is insufficient to produce discourse processing effects, and that sentence comprehension engages recognition memory processes that can be distinguished from those elicited by word lists.

Oct. 8, 2009
12:30 PM
  NADINE GAAB (Harvard University):
"Neural pre-markers of developmental dyslexia in children prior to reading onset"

Abstract:
Developmental dyslexia (DD) is one of the most prominent specific learning disabilities, affecting 5-17% of children. Heritability of DD has been supported by strong evidence from molecular-genetic studies and from studies of twins and families with DD. Substantial evidence suggests that neurological abnormalities underlie DD in children and adults. Multiple functional neuroimaging studies comparing adults and children with DD to typical controls have observed dysfunctions within various brain regions. Differences in the neural correlates of language and auditory processing have also been observed in infants with a family history of reading or language impairments compared to those without. Additionally, it has been suggested that the functional differences observed in children with DD may be related to morphological brain differences. Measures of brain volume have revealed structural abnormalities in children and adults with a diagnosis of DD in regions that broadly overlap with observed functional differences.
A number of key questions remain unanswered. We do not know whether observed functional and structural brain differences associated with DD are present /prior /to reading onset in those who will later receive a diagnosis. We do not know whether these functional and structural differences could be exploited to predict later reading outcome (DD in particular). It also remains unclear how key skills that are impaired in those with DD (e.g., phonological processing and rapid auditory processing) develop in children as they move from the pre-reading to the skilled reading stage. In this talk, I will present preliminary results from our ongoing longitudinal study which investigates possible neural and behavioral pre-markers of DD in pre-reading children (age 4-5) with and without a family history of DD. All children have been examined with standardized tests sampling language and cognitive functions, psychophysical measures, functional magnetic resonance imaging (using a phonological processing task, a rapid auditory processing task and a executive functioning task) and whole brain structural imaging prior to reading onset and after one year of reading instruction. I will further present some recent data looking at the neural correlates of reading fluency in an adult population.
**

October 1, 2009
3:00 PM
  Dr. Malt Joshi, Professor of Reading/Language Arts Education, ESL, and Educational Psychology, Texas A & M, University in the College of Education and Human Development

Talk title TBA

Sept. 24, 2009
12:30 PM
  SHEILA BLUMSTEIN (Brown University):
"Neural Systems Underlying Resolution of Competition in Auditory Word Recognition and Spoken Word Production: Evidence from Lesion and Neuroimaging Investigations"
Sept. 17, 2009
12:30 PM
  Susan Rvachew (McGill University):
"Phonological Processing Skills of Children with Speech Sound Disorders"
Aug. 6, 2009
12:30 p.m.
  Chun-Hsien Hsu, New York University
"EEG studies of Chinese reading: Effects of consistency and neighborhood density"
July 23, 2009
12:30 p.m.
  Ama Steinlen, University of Kiel, Germany
"The Development of Grammatical Comprehension in Bilingual Preschool"
July 2
12:30 pm
  Prakash Padakannaya, University of Mysore
"Reading in Indian orthographies: behavioral and neural studies"
June 18
12:30 p.m.
  Maria Grigos, New York University
"Developmental changes in articulatory kinematics in childhood apraxia of speech"

Susie Levi, New York University
"Talker perception by children with SLI: A possible window into the disorder?"

Christina Reuterskiöld, New York University
"tba"

June 16
12:00 p.m
  Jean Mary Zarate, McGill University
"Neural correlates of vocal pitch regulation in singing"

Abstract: Precise vocal pitch regulation is crucial for prosody in speech and accurate production of notes and melodies in singing. The integration of auditory feedback with the vocal motor system, known as audio-vocal
integration, is essential for vocal pitch regulation; however, its neural substrate is not well understood. We used singing tasks in three functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments designed to: 1) investigate the neural mechanisms underlying vocal pitch regulation, and 2) evaluate the effects of training on vocal performance and neural activity involved in vocal pitch regulation. In Experiment 1, we tested non-musicians and experienced singers with particular singing tasks to
find experience-dependent neural substrates of audio-vocal integration. To target brain activity relevant for audio-vocal integration, we used pitch-shifted auditory feedback and instructed subjects either to adjust
or ignore the shifted feedback. Experiment 2 used a similar fMRI paradigm with large and small pitch shifts to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary vocal pitch regulation and to elucidate the neural mechanisms governing each type of vocal pitch regulation. In
Experiment 3, we trained non-musicians in an auditory discrimination task and administered perceptual discrimination and singing tasks to determine whether training-enhanced auditory discrimination would result
in improved vocal accuracy. We also used fMRI to evaluate any training-induced modulations within brain regions involved in singing and audio-vocal integration. Collectively, the behavioral data showed that correcting for pitch-shifted feedback is an automatic process,
whereas ignoring shifted feedback requires training. The imaging data confirmed the existence of a singing network, comprised of auditory cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, motor and premotor areas, thalamus, and cerebellum; within this network, experienced singers
recruit additional activity in the superior temporal sulcus, rostral cingulate zone, and anterior insula as a network for audio-vocal integration that specifically underlies voluntary vocal pitch regulation. However, auditory training alone is not sufficient to improve vocal accuracy or engage this audio-vocal integration network in
non-musicians.

June 16
2:00 p.m.
  Cathi Best, Haskins Laboratories and University of Western Sydney
"Perceptual assimilation in the native language: Emergent word recognition across dialects"
June 17
2:00 p.m.
  Matt Huenerfauth, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, City University of New York Queens College and Graduate Center
"Generating Animations of American Sign Language Based on Data from Native Signers"
June 11 12:30 pm   ANDREW WALLACE (Brown University)
"Auditory Representation of Vowel Quality"

Abstract:
It is generally assumed that the early stages of speech perception involve the extraction of some kind of generalized auditory patterns or properties from the peripheral input. The auditory representation that results is of considerable interest, since it serves as the input
to higher-level, speech specific processes of phonetic perception. The current research examines this auditory representation using a priming paradigm, in which perception of vowel targets is facilitated when the targets are preceded by acoustically-matched nonspeech stimuli. By manipulating the acoustic parameters of these nonspeech "prime" tones, it is possible to determine the role of these parameters in the auditory stages of vowel processing. Previous results [Wallace and Blumstein, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3245 (2006)] suggest a short
window of analysis of no more than 25 ms. In Experiment 1, frequency of nonspeech primes was varied, with results suggesting broad frequency tuning. In Experiment 2, primes matched to both F1 and F2 of the target vowels were found to elicit a greater priming effect than would be predicted by summing the response to separately-presented F1 and F2 primes, suggesting that the auditory representation of vowels encodes combinations of formant frequencies.

June 4
12:30 pm
  Miguel Moreno (Trinity College and Haskins Laboratories):
"Phonological Constraints on Visual Word Processing in Korean"
May 28
12:30 pm
  SUE FELSENFELD (Southern Connecticut State University):
"Stuttering, Nonfluency, and Attention: What Twins Can Tell Us About These Relationships
May 27
11:00 am
  Silvia Gennari (The University of York):
"Representing actions through language"

Abstract
How do we understand the actions of others as they are described to us through language? Embodied theories of conceptual knowledge suggest that sensory-motor representations of actions similar to those involved in the performance of the action described are recruited during language comprehension. The extent of this recruitment, however, and the brain mechanisms supporting how word meanings are combined remain unknown. In this talk, I will discuss three neuroimaging studies investigating these issues. One study compared the activity elicited by sentences that conveyed different degrees of physical effort (push the piano vs. push the chair vs. see the piano). A graded BOLD response to these sentences, reflecting the graded effort required to perform these actions, was found in the same motoric areas that were activated by physically stressing a ball. A similar response was also found in a part of Broca’s area that was not active in action performance. A subsequent study suggests that the motoric component of such findings is likely confined to brain areas implicated in planning actions, rather than executing them. The fact that Broca’s area is sensitive to the real-world effort entailed by executing the described actions suggests that language comprehension involves a complex interplay between abstract representations of action and linguistically based representations.

May 27
2:00 pm
  Gerry Altmann (The University of York):
"Keeping (eye)track(s) of multiple worlds"

Abstract
The world about us changes at an extraordinary pace. If language is to have any influence on what we attend to, that influence has to be exerted at a pace that can keep up. In this talk I shall focus on two aspects of this requirement: The speed with which language can mediate visual attention, and the fact that the cognitive system can very efficiently make up for the fact that, to be expedient (i.e. to keep up with the changing world) we do not in fact refer to all the changes that are associated with, or entailed, by an event. Rather, we infer aspects of those changes. One example of this is through elaborative inference, and another is through the manner in which we track (often unstated) changes in the states of objects as those objects undergo change. The talk will conclude with data suggesting that multiple representations of the same object in different event-dependent states may in fact compete with one another, and that this competitive process may bring both costs and benefits.

May 21
12:30 pm
  SHELLEY VELLEMAN (University of Massachusetts):
"Speech Characteristics of Children with DUP7 syndrome versus Williams syndrome"

Abstract:

This work focuses on speech development in children with genetic duplication at 7q11.23 ("DUP7"), the same region where deletion results in Williams syndrome ("WS"). Findings include: (1) phonological and apraxia-like motor speech deficits are present in the majority of preschool/school-aged children with DUP7; (2) a comparison of matched pairs of 21- and 24-month-old children with DUP7 versus WS demonstrates reduced volubility and consonant inventories in toddlers with DUP7.

May 14 12:30 pm   MONIKA MOLNAR (McGill University):
"The more you hear, the more you know: Vowel perception in simultaneous bilingual and monolingual speakers of English and French"
May 7
12:30 pm
  Recent Research from the Music Perception Laboratory
Keturah Bixby: "Note Spacing and Tempo Choice In Piano Performance"
Robert Goehrke: "Notation Context, and Envelope Effects in the Tritone Paradox"
Susan Steinman: "Simultaneous Discrete and Emergent Timing"

April 30
12:30 PM
  KATHERINE DEMUTH (Brown University)
"Investigating the development of phonological and morphological representations"

Abstract:
Researchers have long noted that children's early word productions are variable in form, yet the nature and extent of this variability has not been systematically examined. Furthermore, much of our understanding of these issues comes from orthographic and/or IPA transcriptions that may be unable to capture systematic covert contrasts being made. As a result, we still know little about children's early phonological and morphological representations, and how these develop over time. However, our research has begun to show that some of children's early variability in morpheme production is due to contextual effects. Other work finds that children provide acoustic cues to "missing" segments. These results suggest that early phonological and morphological representations may be more robust than often assumed. The theoretical and applied implications are discussed.

April 16
12:30 PM
  SUSAN LAMBRECHT SMITH (University of Maine):
"A Longitudinal Exploration of Speech Production in Children with Dyslexia"
March 23, 2:00   AYUMI SEKI (Tottori University, Japan)
"Neuroimaging Studies of Reading and Language Processing in Japanese"
March 19
12:30
  CAROL WHITNEY (University of Maryland):
"Normal Orthographic Analysis Requires Abnormal Visual Object Processing"
March 19
2:30
  JOHN HOGDEN (Los Alamos National Laboratory):
"A Blind Algorithm for Recovering Articulator Positions from Acoustics

Abstract:
MIMICRI is a signal processing algorithm that has been shown to blindly infer and invert memoryless nonlinear functions of unobservable bandlimited signals, such as the mapping from the unobservable positions of the speech articulators to observable speech sounds. This blind
inversion can be accomplished because the bandwidth of signals almost always increases when transformed by a nonlinear function. Thus, if we transform the observable signals to have the same pass-band as the unobservable signals, then we are within an affine transform of the
unobservable signals. We review results of using MIMICRI on toy problems and on human speech data. We note that MIMICRI requires that the user specifies two parameters, the dimensionality and pass-band of the unobservable signals, but the user may not know the best values to
use. We show how to use cross-validation techniques with MIMICRI to help estimate parameters that previously needed to be specified. An unexpected consequence of this work is that it helps separate signals that have different frequency characteristics. For example, since lip motions tend to be slower than tongue motions, we may be able to
separate the acoustic effects of lips from the acoustic effects of the tongue, or possibly add noise robustness to speech recognition.

March 12
12:30
  Frederick Morrison, (University of Michigan)
"Instructional Influence on Growth of Eary Literacy: The Case for Individualization"
March 5
12:30 pm
  RICHARD McGOWAN (CReSS LLC)
"Some Speech Disorders in School-Aged Children Originate as Normal Behavior" (Download Power Point Presentation)
March 5
2:30 pm
  DON COMPTON, LYNNE FUCHS, and DOUG FUCHS (Vanderbilt University):
"Responsiveness-to-Instructions: Exploring Assumptions about Screening, Interventions, and Definitions of Reading Disability"
March 4
12:30 pm
  WENDY SANDLER (University of Haifa):
"The Kernels of Phonology in a New Sign Language"

Abstract

The property of duality of patterning Ð the existence of two levels of structure, a meaningful level of words and sentences alongside a meaningless level of sounds Ð has been characterized as a basic design feature of human language (Hockett 1960). Some have also argued that a meaningless level, i.e., phonology, must have existed prior to hierarchical syntactic structure in the evolution of language (Pinker & Jackendoff 2005). Sign languages were admitted to the 'bona fide language club' only after Stokoe (1960) demonstrated that they do exhibit duality. But is it possible for a conventionalized language to exist without a fully developed phonological system—without duality? Using evidence from a sign language that has emerged over the past 75 years in a small, insular community, I will show that phonology cannot be taken for granted. The Al-Sayyid Bedouins have a conventionalized language with certain syntactic and morphological regularities (Sandler et al 2005, Aronoff et al 2008), but the language is apparently still in the process of developing a level of structure with discrete meaningless units that behave systematically. In other words, we don't find evidence for a full-blown phonological system in this language. Can a language go on like this? Data from children and from families with several deaf people help to pinpoint emerging regularities and complexity at the level of meaningless formational elements in ABSL. While phonology in language cannot be taken for granted, then, its existence in all older languages, spoken and signed, suggests that it is inevitable. Rather than assume that phonology is somehow 'given' or hard-wired, this work leads us to ask, Why and how does it arise?

Feb. 26
12:30 pm
  David OSTRY (McGill University and Haskins Laboratories):
"Sensory Plasticity and Motor Learning"
Jan. 22
12:30 pm
  HEMANT TAGARE (Yale University): "Image Analysis: Solutions and Challenges"
Jan. 8
1:00 pm
  YANG LEE (Gyeongsang National University, Korea, and University of Connecticut):
"The intrusion of phonology and semantics across two languages: Korean and Chinese"
Dec. 4
12:30 pm
  JASON SHAW and ADAMANTIOS GAFOS (New York University):
"Revisiting the Relation between Linguistic Structure and Temporal Stability"
Nov. 20
12:30 pm
  MICHAEL COE (Charles J. MacCurdy Professor of Anthropology Emeritus, Yale University, and Curator Emeritus of the Anthropology collection in the Peabody Museum of Natural History): "How the Ancient Maya Wrote"
Nov., 6
2:00 PM
  LASSE BOMBIEN (University of Munich)
"Intrinsic and Prosodic Effects on Articulatory Coordination in Initial Consonant Clusters." (download pdf)
Download the Presentation in pdf format
Oct. 23
12:30 AM
  BARBARA JUHASZ (Wesleyan University)
"Investigations into Meaning: Age-of-Acquisition Effects and Sensory Experiences with Words"
Oct. 9
12:30 PM
  JONATHAN PRESTON (Haskins Laboratories):
"Phonological processing and speech production in children with speech sound disorders"
Oct. 2
12:30 PM
  NIKKI DAVIS (Vanderbilt University)
"Neuroimaging Correlates of Simple Arithmetic Processing in Children"
Sept. 25
12:30 PM
  MICHAEL GROSVALD (University of California, Davis)
"An Investigation of Long-Distance Coarticulation in American Sign Language"
Sept. 11
11:30 PM
  Brown Bag with the President

August 7
12:30
  DAN MIRMAN (University of Connecticut):
"The Nature of Spoken Language Impairments in Aphasia"

Abstract:

Studying the complex and rapid processing of spoken language in typical and impaired populations requires a sophisticated set of scientific tools. I will describe a combination of experimental, statistical, and computational modeling tools developed for the study of typical spoken language processing and how these tools can be used to study the nature of spoken language impairments in aphasia. The visual world eye-tracking paradigm provides an experimental tool that reveals the precise time course of spoken language processing in a naturalistic and (relatively) simple task. Growth curve analysis provides powerful quantification of fixation time course, including quantification of individual differences. Simulation studies of computational models provide a concrete method for testing theoretical interpretations of the experimental results. When applied to the study of spoken word recognition in aphasia, these techniques suggest an integrated "dynamic balance" theory of Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia.

July 31
12:30
  F.-XAVIER ALARIO (CNRS & Universitè de Provence, Marseille):
"Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Determiner Production"

Abstract:
Language production is sometimes described as a process in which conceptual semantic messages drive the selection of linguistic information. Such a description is probably appropriate for some aspects of the process (e.g. noun selection), yet it is clearly incomplete.

Consider for instance the fact that in numerous languages determiner forms depend not only on semantics, but also on several other kinds of information. In Germanic, Slavic, and Romance languages, the retrieval of the determiners (and other closed- class words, such as pronouns) also depends on a property of the nouns called "grammatical gender." For instance, in Dutch, nouns belong to the so-called "neuter" gender or to the "common" gender. The definite determiners accompanying the nouns belonging to the two sets are respectively het (e.g. het huis, 'the house') and de (e.g. de appel, the apple). In English, consonant-initial nouns and vowel-initial noun can require different indefinite article forms (e.g. a pear vs. an apple).

Such properties of determiners surely impose constraints on how these lexical items can be retrieved. For this very reason, determiners provide a broad testing ground for contrasting psycholinguistic hypothesis of lexical processing and grammatical encoding. In my talk, I will review the cross-linguistic research I have been conducting on determiner retrieval. One important question that will be asked, and only tentatively answered, concerns the extent to which open-class words such as nouns and closed-class words such as determiners are processed and selected by similar mechanisms.

July 24
12:30 p.m.
  BRUNO GALANTUCCI (Yeshiva University and Haskins Laboratories). "Links between perception and production: old and new perspectives."
July 17
12:30 p.m.
  ANJANA BHAT (University of Connecticut):
"Early markers for developmental delays in young infants"

June 4, 2:00 PM Haskin   Dragh Sibley, George Mason University
"Large-scale modeling of single word reading and recognition".
July 7, 2:00 PM
Haskins
  Brian Byrne, University of New England, Australia, will be visiting the Lab for just one day, Monday, July 7. He will give a talk at 2pm in the large conference room, entitled:

*Early literacy development: Tracking the influences of genes, homes, teachers, schools and countries *

Brian is a long-time Haskins collaborator who has been a leader in
behavior genetic studies of reading and learning.

May 15,
11:30 AM
Haskins
  Brown Bag with the President
May 8,
12:30 PM
Haskins
  Maria Piñango, Yale University Linguistics
Broca's Agrammatism: Production, Comprehension and the
Architecture of Language

Abstract:
Comprehension and production deficits associated with
Broca's agrammatism have traditionally received non-converging
generalizations despite having in common the idea that the deficit has a syntactic source. Such a situation seems to suggest that the locus of the problem may not be in the linguistic representation itself but in its dynamic instantiation. Capitalizing on this insight, I present an alternative view whereby the production and comprehension patterns of impairment manifested in the syndrome stem from a unified processing-based source. Crucially, this view is built upon a linguistically-based processing model that takes syntactic representation to be a dynamic manifestation of sentence formation. This analysis and its implications will be discussed in the context not only of theories of cortical distribution of language, given the localizing value of Broca's aphasia agrammatism, but also of theories of language processing and representation.

May 1,
12:30 PM
Haskins
  Ken Pugh, Haskins Laboratories
Town Meeting, Agenda [PDF]
April 17,
12:30 PM
Haskins
  JOSHUA J. DIEHL, Yale Child Study Center and Haskins Laboratories
More than words: Prosody processing in high-functioning autism
April 10,
12:30 PM
Haskins
  Three Yale seniors will report research they have done at Haskins Laboratories in collaboration with Bruno Repp.

MEIJIN BRUTTOMESSO:
Effects of Metrical Subdivision on the Continuation, Reproduction, and Perception of Beat Tempo"

JACKIE THOMPSON:
Context Effects in the Tritone Paradox

HAITHAM JENDOUBI:
Effects of Phase-Shifted Subdivisions on Synchronization with a Beat

 

April 3,
12:30 PM
Haskins
  HOLLY FITCH, University of Connecticut

Animal models of early cortical disruption: possible relevance tso higher-order functional disruptions in humans

March 27, 12:30 PM
Haskins

 

  Ken McRae, University of Western Ontario
Psychology Department.

Testing An Attractor Network Model of Word Meaning

Abstract
Over the past several years, we have investigated a number of predictions derived from a distributed attractor network view of word meaning. This view differs substantially from older spreading activation semantic network models. In particular, a theory based on attractor networks entails that people naturally (and implicitly) learn the distributional statistics that are present in their environment, and that this knowledge influences the computation of word meaning. I describe simulations and associated human experiments to make three main points. First, people learn and use information regarding how features of objects are correlated (e.g., things that have four legs also tend to have fur). Second, distinctive features that are strong cues to an object's identity (e.g., if something moos, it's a cow) are computed quickly when people read a concept name (such as "cow"). Third, superordinate concepts such as "fruit" can be learned from experience with basic-level concepts such as "cherry" and "banana" by combining the influence of labeling with knowledge of distributional statistics. Although we use an attractor network model that contains no transparent hierarchical structure, it not only produces emergent behavior that makes it seem as if it has a hierarchical architecture, it also explains data that are inconsistent unless network temporal dynamics are taken into account.

March 28, 4:00PM
UConn
Bousfield 160, STORRS

 

Ken McRae, University of Western Ontario

How Knowledge of Real-world Events Influences Language Comprehension

Abstract
A significant proportion of everyday utterances concern real-word events. Thus, people's knowledge of everyday events, including their common participants, is an important component of language comprehension. In many theories of language comprehension, event knowledge is outside of "the lexicon", is accessed slowly, and influences comprehension only after an architecturally-determined time delay. In contrast, I present results from semantic priming and sentence comprehension studies that strongly support a view in which event knowledge is organized efficiently so that it is computed immediately from words (and combinations of words). In addition, our studies show that event knowledge is an important source of information that is used to generate expectancies about upcoming concepts and syntactic structure during on-line sentence comprehension.

Feb. 28, 12:30 PM   LUCA ONNIS (Cornell University)
Variation Sets Facilitate Artificial language Learning

Abstract:
Variation set structure --- partial alignment of successive utterances in child-directed speech --- has been shown to correlate with progress in the acquisition of syntax by children. The present study demonstrates that arranging a certain proportion of utterances in a training corpus in variation sets facilitates word segmentation and phrase structure learning in the acquisition of miniature artificial languages by adult subjects.

The positive effects of variation sets in the reported experiments suggest that learners can reuse the same learning procedures --- alignment, and comparison --- at different levels of linguistic structure (here, lexical and phrasal units). We are presently extending
our approach to investigate whether variation sets also facilitate the learning of other core features of language, such as lexical categorization, long-distance dependencies, and recursion.

Beyond having implications for understanding the course of L1 acquisition by children, this work contributes to the development of more efficient algorithms for automatic language acquisition, as well as better methods for L2 instruction.

Feb. 21, 12:30 PM   SUZANNE BOYCE (University of Cincinnati)
Changes in Speech Clarity due to Sleep Deprivation
Feb. 14, 12:30 PM   HUA SHU (Beijing Normal University)
An update on reading research in China: Tracking reading development and reading disability
Jan. 31, 12:30 - 2:30 PM   Athena Vouloumanos (New York University):
"Speech as signal for infants"

 

Nov. 1, 12:30 PM   Elliot Saltzman, Hosung Nam, and Louis Goldstein, Haskins Laboratories. (Title to be announced).
Nov. 15, 12:30 - 2:30 PM   Haskins Tech Update. Richard Crane and staff
Oct. 11, 2007
12:30 PM
  Tim Saltuklaroglu (University of Tennessee),
Vijaya Guntupalli (East Tennessee State U.), and
Joseph Kalinowski (East Carolina University):
    "A double-edged sword: Producing repetitions and prolongations inhibits stuttering and propagates emotional arousal via the mirror system"

Also visiting will be Albert Zhang and Dan Hudock from East Carolina University. (PowerPoint presentation)

Oct. 4 , 2007 12:30-5:05 PM   Haskins Internal Workshop: Speech Production / Motor Control Group
Sep. 27, 2007
12:30 PM
  Patrice Beddor, University of Michigan. "The phonetics and phonology of nasal gestures"

(PowerPoint presentation)
Sep. 20, 2007
1:00 PM
  Karen Livescu, MIT. "Factoring Speech into Linguistic Features"
June 28, 2007
12:30 PM
  Dennis Molfese, University of Louisville. ERPs and Reading Ability.
June 15, 2007   Piers Messum, University College London.
June 14, 2007   David Isenberg, Principal Prosultant (sm) of isen.com, LLC. "How one Haskins Post-Doc Learned Phonetics, Got Stupid and Got a Life."
June 7, 2007
12:30 PM
  Jeffrey Runner, University of Rochester. "Structural constraints on the interpretation of elided anaphors."
Apr. 27, 2007
1:00 PM
  Hua Shu (Beijing Normal University). "Reading development in Chinese: An update on behavioral and neurobiological findings"
Apr. 19, 2007
3:00 PM
  Georgije Lukatela (Belgrade, Serbia). "Bi-alphabetical Perceptual Identification: Phonological Mediation in Implicit Memory Priming"
Mar. 29, 2007
2:00 PM
  Khalil Iskarous, Haskins Laboratories. "Recovering Place of Articulation from the Speech Signal"
Mar. 8, 2007
2:00 PM
  Robert E. Remez, Barnard College, Columbia University. "The sound of your 'Hello!' The role of phonetic sensitivity in the perceptual identification of talkers."
Mar. 8, 2007
11:00 AM
  Dominic Massaro, University of California, Santa Cruz. "Talking Faces: Technology, Research, and Applications."
Mar. 1, 2007
2:00 PM
  Leo Blomert, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. "At the Roots of Literacy: fMRI and ERP Studies of Grapheme-Phoneme Integration."
Feb. 22, 2006
2:00 PM
  Takayuki Ito, Haskins Laboratories. "Contributions of Cutaneous Afferent Information in Speech."
Feb. 15, 2006
2:00 PM
  Dan Mirman, University of Connecticut and Haskins Laboratories. "Interactive Processing in Speech Comprehension."
Dec. 7, 2006
12:30 PM
  Michael Goldstein. Cornell University.


"Learning by Babbling: Social Mechanisms of Prelinguistic Vocal Development."
Nov. 30, 2006
12:30 PM
  Jeremy Skipper. Rutgers University, Newark.

"Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception."

Nov. 16, 2006
12:30 PM
  Michael Tyler
Nov. 9, 2006
12:30 PM
  Gerald McRoberts. Haskins Laboratories.
"Infants' Perception of Repeated Patterns in Speech and the Discovery of Language Structure"
Nov. 2, 2006
12:30 PM
  Reiner Wilhelms-Tricarico. From Muscle Models to Tongue Models.
(Presentation in PDF format.)
Oct. 26, 2006
12:30 PM
 

Len Katz. Two statistical issues journal editors are concerned about:
(1) the appropriate analysis when your experiment includes items or tokens, and
(2) the death of null hypothesis testing.

Oct. 19, 2006
12:30 PM
 

Fermin Moscoso Del Prado Martin. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. A sketch of an information-theoretical approach to lexical processing.

Sep. 15, 2006
10:30 AM
  Bernd J. Kröger, University of Aachen. Modeling sensory-to-motor mappings using neural nets and a 3D articulatory speech synthesizer.
June 29, 2006
12:30 PM
  Douglas Whalen — Progress Report on Project 2 of the A-40 Grant: Neurobiological Foundations of Speech
June 22, 2006
12:30 PM
  Iris Berent — What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from Perceptual illusions Abstract
June 15, 2006
12:30 PM
  David Braze — Skill-related Differences in the Online Reading Behavior of Young Adults
June 1, 2006
12:30 p.m
  Anna Barney (University of Southampton)—
The Effect of Glottal Opening on the Acoustic Response of the Vocal Tract.
(PowerPoint presentation)

May 25, 2006
12:30 PM
  Carol Fowler will provide a Progress Report on Project 1 of the A40 Grant: Developing the Theory
of Phonological Practice
May 18, 2006
12:30 PM
  Michael Turvey - Progress Report on Project 6 of the A40 Grant: Rapid Componential Processing in Visual Word Identification at Phonological and Morphological Levels
May 11, 2006
12:30 PM
  Elana Golumbic (Hebrew University) - Oscillatory neural activity - a window into higher cognitive processes? Evidence from face perception and word recognition
May 4, 2006   Ken Pugh—Progress Report on A40 Project 4: Neurobiological Mechanisms for Word Recognition
Apr. 27, 2006   Derek Lyons
Illusions of Causality: An Exploration of the Overimitation Effect
Apr. 6, 2006   Haskins Discovery Day
Five-minute presentations on discoveries made in the new building were presented by Doug Whalen, Bruno Repp, Gaurav Mathur, Martha Tyrone, Diane Lillo-Martin, Julia Irwin, Gerry McRoberts, Dave Braze, Mark Tiede, Laura Koenig, Jay Rueckl, Laurie Feldman, Michael Turvey, and Einar Mencl. Afterwards there was a celebration of the funding of A75, A93 and A108
Mar. 30, 2006   Aby Cohn, Cornell University Linguistics Department. "Levels of abstractness in phonology and the lexicon: evidence from English homophones"
Mar. 23, 2006   Susan Nittrouer, Ohio State University
"Discovering the Linguistically Relevant Structure of the Speech Signal: What Hearing and Deaf Children Must Do and How They Do It"
Mar. 16, 2006   Anders Löfqvist
Feb. 23, 2006   Jay Dixon
Feb. 2, 2006   Keith R. Kluender