RESEARCH
PEOPLE
PUBLICATIONS
GIVING


UNDERSTANDING SPEECH
READING
SPEECH TECHNOLOGY
| Thurs., January 17, 2013 12:30 pm |
Michael Turvey, University of Connecticut and Haskins Laboratories) Title: "Esther Thelen Memorial Lecture: Ecology and Dynamics of Movement Development" |
|
| Friday, Dec. 7, 2012 | Hannah Block, "Neural substrates of sensory and motor adaptation" | |
| Thurs., Dec., 6, 2012 |
Stephen Frost, Haskins Laboratories "Experiment du jour" |
|
| Thurs., Nov., 29, 2012 |
Adrian Staub, University of Massachusetts (Amherst) “Understanding 'prediction' in the cloze task: Data and model” Abstract: |
|
| Thurs., Sept. 20, 2012 12:30 pm |
Margie Gillis, Haskins Laboratories and LiteracyHow “Reading research in the classroom: What should teachers know and be able to do?” |
|
| Thurs., Sept., 20, 2012 2:00 pm |
Caicai Zhang, Language Engineering Laboratory, The Chinese University of Hong Kong "Perceptual normalization of talker variability in lexical tone perception" Abstract ABSTRACT: In speech production, the same speech sounds produced by different talkers has dramatically different acoustic realizations. Talker variability in speech signals poses a challenge for rapid and accurate speech perception. Nevertheless, listeners show extraordinary success in recovering the intended linguistic message. How listeners manage to map variable acoustic signals onto identical words is a fundamental question in speech perception. This question is investigated in the context of lexical tone perception. In this talk, I discuss three studies which investigate (1) whether the configuration of a tone system (Mandarin and Cantonese) affects the perception of multi-talker tone stimuli; (2) whether speech and nonspeech contexts have equal effect on talker normalization; and (3) when the putative talker normalization process takes place in on-line word identification. |
|
| Tuesday., Sept., 25, 2012 12:50 pm |
Liliana Ricon Gonzalez, MS, Biomedical Engineering Program, Arizona State University “Perturbing the proprioceptive map of the arm" |
|
| Thurs., Sept. 27, 2012 12:30 pm |
Heather Bortfeld, Haskins Laboratories and UConn Department of Psychology “Assessing developmental change in normal and impaired auditory processing” |
|
| Thurs., Oct. 4, 2012 | Keiichi Tajima, Hosei University, Tokyo | |
| Thurs., Oct. 11, 2012 12:30 pm |
Matt Weber, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at Penn State “Cue Competition and Cognitive Control" |
|
| Thurs., Sept. 6, 2012 12:30 pm |
Bryan Gick, USB Department of Liquistics "A whole-event model for speech" |
|
| Thurs., Sept. 13 12:30 pm |
Suzanne Dikker, NYU Linquistics | |
| Thurs, August 23, 2012 12:30 pm | Anders Lofqvist, Haskins Laboratories Development of speech motor control: Lip movement variability This study examined variability of lip movements across repetitions of the same utterance as a function of age in Swedish speakers. The specific purpose was to extend earlier findings by examining both temporal and spatial variability. Subjects were 50 typically developed native Swedish children and adults (28 females, 22 males, aged 5-31 years). Lip movements were recorded during 15-20 repetitions of a short Swedish phrase using three-dimensional articulography. After correction for head movements, the kinematic records were expressed in a maxilla-based coordinate system. Movement onset and offset of the utterance were identified using kinematic landmarks. The Euclidean distance between receivers on the upper and lower lips was calculated and subjected to functional data analysis to assess both temporal and spatial variability. Results show a decrease in both indices as a function of age, with a greater reduction of amplitude variability. There was no difference between males and females for either index. The two indices were weakly correlated with each other, suggesting that they capture different aspects of speech production. Speaking rate also increased with age, but variability was unrelated to rate. The variability of speaking rate, measured as the standard deviation of utterance duration, also decreased with age. The present results thus suggest that age related changes in speech motor control continue up until 30 years of age. |
|
| Thurs., August 30, 2012 12:30 pm |
Jon Preston, Haskins Laboratories and Department of Communication Disorders, SCSU | |
| Thurs, June 14, 2012 POSTPONED UNTIL FALL |
Laura Koenig, Haskins Laboratories and Communication Sciences and Disorders, LIU “Aspects of speech production in typically-developing children” |
|
| Thurs, June 21, 2012 POSTPONED UNTIL FALL |
Jennifer Thomson, Harvard Graduate School of Education TBA |
|
| Thurs, June 28, 2012 POSTPONED UNTIL FALL |
Jon Preston, Haskins Laboratories and Department of Communication Disorders, SCSU “Ultrasound biofeedback for children with persisting speech sound disorders” |
|
| Thurs, July 12, 2012 12:30 pm |
Stephen Frost, Haskins Laboratories “Experiment du jour” |
|
| July 16, 2012 2:00 pm |
Arnaud Szmalec, Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University The interaction between memory and language: Insights from normal language acquisition and impaired written language processing |
|
| Thurs, July 26, 2012 12:30 pm |
Lawrence Brancazio, Haskins Laboratories and Psychology Department, SCSU “Measures of audiovisual speech perception” |
|
| August 2, 2012 12:30 pm |
Catherine Wiley, MD, Reach Out and Read CT & Chief, Division of General Pediatrics, UCONN School of Medicine “Promoting Early Literacy: A Peek into the Exam Roomn” |
|
| Thurs, May 31, 2012 12:45 pm. Note the unusual time. |
Maria Piñango, Yale University, Linguistics Abstract: |
|
| Thurs, May 24, 2012 12:30 pm |
Martha Tyrone, Haskins Laboratories and Communication Science and Disorders, LIU “Sign language research at Haskins” |
|
| Thurs, May 17, 2012 12:30 pm |
Tine Mooshammer, Haskins Laboratories “Speech errors around the world” |
|
| Thurs, May 10, 2012 12:30 pm |
Evelina Fedorenko, Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT A novel framework for a neural architecture of language In this talk I will argue that high-level linguistic processing is accomplished by the joint engagement of two functionally and computationally distinct brain systems: i) the classic “language regions” on the lateral surfaces of left frontal and temporal lobes that appear to be functionally specialized for linguistic processing, showing little or no response to arithmetic, general working memory, cognitive control or music (e.g., Fedorenko et al., 2011; Monti et al., 2009), and ii) the fronto-parietal network, a set of regions that are engaged across a wide range of cognitive demands (e.g., Duncan, 2001, 2010). Most past neuroimaging work on language processing has not explicitly distinguished between these two systems, especially in the frontal lobes, where subsets of each system reside side by side within the region referred to as “Broca’s area”. Using methods which surpass traditional methods in sensitivity and functional resolution - i.e., identifying key brain regions functionally in each individual brain (Fedorenko et al., 2010; Saxe et al., 2006) - we are beginning to characterize the important roles played by both domain-specific and domain-general brain regions in linguistic processing. |
|
| Thurs, April 12, 2012 12:30 pm |
Dr Rupal Patel, Northeastern University "Assistive technology for teaching and learning language" |
|
| Thurs, April 12, 2012 2:00 pm |
Emma Hayiou-Thomas, University of York, UK "The shape of the phenotype: Genetic and environmental influences on typical and atypical language development" |
|
| Thurs, April 12, 2012 12:30 pm |
Adamantios Gafos “Dynamics in grammar" |
|
| Thurs, March 22, 2012 12:30 pm |
Nicole Landi, “Studies of reading and language impairment, from low-level to high-level deficits” |
|
| Thurs, March 15, 2012 12:30 pm |
Anneke Slis, University of Toronto "General co-articulatory Characteristics of repetitive Speech" |
|
| Thurs, March 15, 2012 2:00 pm |
Chi-Ming Chen, University of Connecticut "Cognitive function and sensory processing in schizophrenia: EEG, MRS, and TMS approaches" |
|
| Thurs., Feb., 23, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. |
Julie Van Dyke, Haskins Laboratories "Reading beyond the word and back again: The next generation of reading research at Haskins" |
|
| Thurs., Feb., 9, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. |
Julia Irwin, Haskins Laboratories and Southern Connecticut State University "Reading beyond the word and back again: The next generation of reading research at Haskin"s |
|
| Thurs., Feb., 2, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. |
MARK TIEDE, Haskins Laboratories "Noggin nodding: quantifying head movements correlated with increased difficulty in accelerating speech production tasks" |
|
| Thurs., Jan., 26, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. |
BERNARD GRELA University of Connecticut, Dept. of Communication Sciences "Processing Based Deficits in Children with Specific Language Impairment" |
|
| Thurs., Jan., 19, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. |
Takayuki Ito “Sensorimotor function in speech production and perception” |
|
| Thurs., Jan., 5, 2012 at 12:30 p.m. | Tara McAllister, Montclair State University
"Preliminary comparison of spectral versus ultrasound biofeedback: Implications for the causes of residual speech errors" |
|
| Thurs., Dec. 8 at 12:30 p.m. | RACHEL M. THEODORE (University of Connecticut, Dept. of Communication Sciences): "Representational specificity in spoken language processing" |
|
| Thurs., Dec. 1 at 12:30 p.m. | KEN PUGH (Haskins Laboratories, University of Connecticut, and Yale University): "The neurocognitive foundations of typical and atypical reading development: Contributions from Haskins scientists" |
|
| Thurs., Nov. 17 at 12:30 p.m. | Takemi Mochida, NTT Communication Science Labs., Japan Impact of self-articulatory movement on speech perception Speech motor system is thought to be linked to speech perception. Recent studies have suggested that motor areas somatotopically related to individual speech organs such as the lips and tongue can be coactivated in a phoneme-dependent manner during speech perception. However, the direct contribution of articulatory movements to speech perception has been little studied. We examined the intelligibility of plosive-initial syllables when listeners simultaneously and silently articulated discordant plosive-initial syllables, and compared with those when listeners simultaneously watched a face producing discordant syllables. The results revealed an interesting contrast between auditory-visual and auditory-articulatory interactions. In the case of auditory-visual interaction, larger divergence of the visible articulatory information from the auditory stimulus had a heavier effect. On the contrary, auditory-articulatory interaction occurred only WITHIN the same primary articulator, and did not ACROSS different articulators. |
|
| Thurs, Nov. 17 at 1:30 p.m. | Hiroaki Gomi, NTT Communication Science Labs, Japan Perception of self-action is violated by implicit sensorimotor process. We usually think of well-learned daily movements, such as reaching and walking, as being fully controlled by our action intentions. Typically, the sensory outcomes of our movements would be recognized as self-actions (as opposed to movements of the external world) due to an internal model prediction using 'efference copy' of our motor commands. Here we describe an exception to this rule, which is caused by an implicit motor process. When we step onto a stationary escalator, we frequently suffer clumsy body and leg movements and associated odd sensation. Even though we completely understand the environmental state of the stopped escalator, we cannot avoid behaving clumsily, and feeling an odd sensation before adaptation. From experimental results of behavioral measures and subjective odd sensation scores, we suggested that this odd sensation is triggered by the implicit expectation that the escalator is in fact moving, rather than the changes of the center of gravity by irregular steps or entrance slope. Further experiments involving the systematic manipulation of the surrounding visual motion indicated that exogenous postural changes elicited by visual motion can induce a similar odd sensation. This result suggests that the implicit behavioral change itself, rather than endogenous motor program, is a 'necessary' factor of the odd sensation in perception of movement. |
|
| Thurs., Nov. 10 at 12:30 p.m. | MICHAEL TURVEY, University of Connecticut and Haskins Laboratories "Degrees-of-freedom problem: 40 years and counting" This talk is part of the Speaker Series: THE HASKINS LEGACY - The Science of the Spoken and Written Word. |
|
| Thurs., Nov. 3 at 12:30 p.m. | William E. Tunmer, Massey University, New Zealand Visiting Professor in the School of Education at Harvard "The Simple View of Reading Redux: The Dual Role of Vocabulary Knowledge in Early Literacy Development" Abstract Supplementary reading includes two papers, which are attached: 1. William E. Tunmer and James W. Chapman. "The Simple View of Reading Redux: Vocabulary Knowledge and the Independent Components Hypothesis." (Tunmer_JLD.pdf) 2. William E. Tunmer and James W. Chapman. "Does Set for Variability Mediate the Influence of Vocabulary Knowledge on the Development of Word Recognition Skills?" (TunmerSSSR.pdf)
|
|
| Thurs., Oct. 20 at 12:30 p.m. | VINCENT GRACCO (McGill University and Haskins Laboratories): "Sensorimotor coupling for speech: A framework for development, disorders and brain-behavior relations" |
|
| Thurs., Oct. 13 at 12:30 p.m. | Diana Van Lancker Sidtis, New York University) "Modes of talk: A curious tale of spontaneous speech, formulaic language and two versions of repetition" Download supplemental reading in PDF |
|
| Sept. 29, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
BRUNO GALANTUCCI (Yeshiva University and Haskins Laboratories): "Social Factors in the Emergence of Human Communication" |
|
| Sept. 22, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
Len Katz, Haskins Laboratories and UConn "Reading Research at Haskins: A Personnel History" |
|
| Sept. 8, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
MORTEN CHRISTIANSEN (Cornell University): Stream the two part talk Abstract: Individuals differ considerably in their ability to process language. Traditionally, such differences have been attributed to variations in a biologically-determined working memory capacity. In this talk, I propose an alternative account that emphasizes the importance of variations in linguistic experience as a cause of individual differences in language processing. Focusing on relative clause processing, I present results from studies manipulating language exposure in both connectionist networks and human subjects to test predictions from this usage-based perspective. Further experimental data suggest that individual differences in basic abilities for sequential learning and processing may affect individuals' ability to learn from linguistic experience. Together, these results underscore the role of experience in sentence comprehension and challenge the importance of a fixed working memory in accounting for individual differences in language processing. |
|
| Sept. 1, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
DONNA ERICKSON (Showa Music University, Kawasaki, Japan): "Articulation (EMA) of English Rhythm: Comparison of Productions of Native and Non-Native Speakers" Abstract: Previous work suggests that concurrent changes in jaw displacement and formant frequencies may manifest rhythmical characteristics of spoken American English utterances [e.g., Erickson et al, 2011. Rhythm and Emphasis in American English : Comparison of native and non-native speakers' productions. Proceedings of International Seminar of Speech Production, Montreal, Canada, pp.345-352]. This paper compares jaw displacement and corresponding formant frequencies of monosyllabic American English words produced on low vowels as spoken by three native speakers and three Japanese speakers of English. Preliminary findings for the native speakers show an alternating pattern of strong-weak jaw displacement along with corresponding changes in F1. Interestingly, this articulatory/acoustic pattern seems to correspond with metrical grids for these utterances. For the non-native speakers, this pattern was not consistently seen, and seemed to vary as a function of the speakers' skill in spoken English. (This work was supported in part by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sport, & Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) #22520412.) |
|
| July 28, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
Katrina Schleisman, Ph.D. candidate University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN "Antipriming Accompanies Priming of Post-Visual Word Representations: Evidence for Ongoing Adjustments to Superimposed Representations" Abstract Cross-modal repetition priming effects in long-term memory experiments can be useful for investigating properties of post-visual processing of printed words. In three experiments, we tested whether antipriming (impairment in the processing of a stimulus) accompanies repetition priming effects, as has been observed previously in visual object priming studies. We measured both priming and antipriming relative to a baseline condition and found significant long-term cross-modal repetition priming when the test task was word naming or lexical decision. More important, we found significant antipriming when the test task was word naming (requiring individuation of words) but not when the test task was lexical decision (not requiring individuation of words). These results suggest that post-visual word representations in long-term memory are overlapping and are modified with experience, and relevant theories are discussed. |
|
| July 14, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
ERIC VATIKIOTIS-BATESON (University of British Columbia and Haskins Laboratories): "Coordination and timing in speech: resisting invariance" |
|
| July 7, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
Valerie Shafer The Graduate Center, City University of New York Maturation of neural correlates of speech processing Abstract |
|
| June 30, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
LOUIS GOLDSTEIN (University of Southern California and Haskins Laboratories): "Roots and Prospects of an Articulatory Phonology" |
|
| June 16, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
ROBERT REMEZ (Barnard College and Haskins Laboratories): "Analogy and Disanalogy in Production and Perception of Speech" |
|
| June 2, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
JAY RUECKL (University of Connecticut and Haskins Laboratories): "Word Recognition by Skilled Readers: Insights from Computational, Behavioral, and Neuroimaging Evidence" |
|
| May 26, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
LAURIE FELDMAN (SUNY at Albany and Haskins Laboratories): "Bi-alphabetism and Bilingualism as Windows on Language Processing" |
|
| May 12, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
ALEXANDRA JESSE (University of Massachusetts and Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen): "The Benefits of Audiovisual Communication Across the Lifespan" Abstract: |
|
| May 5, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
PRASANTA GHOSH (University of Southern California): "A computational framework for exploring the role of speech production in speech recognition" Abstract: It has been shown several times that the speech recognition accuracy improves if the direct measurement of speech articulation is used in addition to the speech acoustics from the talker. However, access to such direct speech articulation data during speech recognition is not feasible in practice. In my presentation, I shall show that the speech production/articulation features can be estimated from the speech signal of any arbitrary talker although these features are not directly available from the talker. For the estimation of production-oriented features, I shall present a talker-independent acoustic-to-articulatory inversion framework using generalized smoothness criterion, which requires parallel articulatory and acoustic data from a single subject only (exemplar) and this exemplar need not be any of the talkers. Use of these estimated features improves the acoustic-feature based recognition accuracy by ~4% (absolute) in a phonetic recognition experiment on TIMIT corpus. Interestingly, when the exemplar is interpreted as a listener, the production-oriented features and, hence, the speech recognition can be interpreted as listener-specific. We will see that such a listener-specific framework to speech recognition provides a production-oriented explanation of the variability in recognition accuracy by non-native listeners. We will also see that the listener-specific framework acts as a bridge between the scientific and technological viewpoints towards the role of speech production in speech perception in the human speech communication. |
|
| April 14, 2011 1:00 p.m. |
RECENT RESEARCH FROM THE MUSIC PERCEPTION AND ACTION LABORATORY WITHIN HASKINS LABORATORIES (Bruno H. Repp, Principal Investigator) BRIAN FIDALI (Yale '11): ALLEN ZHANG (Yale '11): EVAN ZHAO (Yale '11): |
|
| April 21, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
Elliott Saltzman, Boston University and Haskins Laboratories "Invariance and variability in sensorimotor coordination and control: A visual approach" |
|
| April 21, 2011 2:00 p.m. |
Daniel Levitin, McGill University "This Is Your Brain on Music" |
|
| April 7, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
BRUNO H. REPP, Haskins Laboratories "Twenty-Five Years of Research on Music Perception and Action at Haskins Laboratories" |
|
| March 24, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
Christine Shadle, (Haskins Labs) "Research on Fricatives: Haskins Laboratories' Influence" |
|
| March 10, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
Katherine Harris “Speech production research at Haskins Laboratories" |
|
| March 3, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
CHRIS BREGLER (New York University): "From eye-balls to ball-games: Next-gen motion capture for science and entertainment" | |
| Feb., 10, 2011 12:30 p.m. |
PETER MOLFESE (Haskins Laboratories): "ERPs of children in a reading intervention" |
|
| Jan 20, 2011 12:30 |
ALISON AUSTIN (Haskins Laboratories): "When children learn more than what they are taught: Regularization in child and adult learners |
|
| Jan 13, 2011 12:30 |
Michael Studdert-Kennedy *Haskins Legacy" series celebrating the 75th anniversary of the Laboratories' existence |
|
| Thurs., Dec. 9 | David Ostry (McGill University. & Haskins Labs) "Sensory Plasticity and Motor Learning" | |
| Wed., Nov 17 | Jean Vroomen (Tilburg University) | |
| Thurs., Nov. 18 | Donald Shankweiler (Haskins Labs) | |
| Tues., Nov 9 1:00 p.m |
Barbara Höhle (U. Potsdam) "Crossing the boundaries: Phonological cues to early word segmentation in German and Turkish learning infants" Abstract: |
|
| Thurs, Nov. 4, 2:00 PM |
Philip Rubin, "Talking Heads: speech embodied, embedded and enactive" |
|
| Thurs, Oct. 21, 12:30 p.m |
AUSTIN FRANK (Haskins Laboratories) "Linguistic Knowledge Includes Motor Knowledge" |
|
| Oct. 14 12:30 PM |
Douglas Whalen, Tentative title: "Links between perception and production" |
|
| Thurs, Sept. 30, 2010, 2:00 p.m. | Haskins Laboratories 75th Anniversary Series ARTHUR ABRAMSON Haskins Speech Research in New York City |
|
| Thurs, Sept. 23, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | DARAGH E. SIBLEY (Haskins Laboratories): "Impact of Dialect Knowledge on a Basic Component of Reading" Abstract: |
|
| Thurs, Sept. 16, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | CAROL FOWLER (Haskins Laboratories and University of Connecticut): "Common currency in language use" |
|
| Thurs, Sept. 9, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | MELVYN ROERDINK (Free University, Amsterdam): "Sensorimotor Synchronization: Basic Research and Its Application in Gait Rehabilitation" |
|
| Thurs., July 15, 2010, 12:00 pm | Mark Antoniou, MARCS, University of Western Sidney download PDF |
|
| Thurs., July 15, 2010, 2:00 pm | Denis Burnham, MARCS, University of Western Sidney download PFD |
|
| Thurs., June 17, 2010, 12:30 pm | Mara Breen, UMass "Stress matters: Evidence of lexical stress assignment in silent reading" |
|
| Thurs., June 3, 2010, 2:00 pm | Jonathan Preston, Haskins Laboratories "Interventions for Speech Sound Disorders" |
|
| Tues., May 25, 2010, 12:30 pm | Michael Ian Proctor, USC
Winner of the 2010 Alvin M. Liberman Prize "Articulatory Characterization of Complex Consonants - Liquids and Fricatives" |
|
| Thurs., May 13, 2010, 12:30 pm | Clint Johns, Haskins Laboratories
"Do you know who that is? An ERP examination of ambiguous anaphors with real-world referents" Abstract: Establishing coreference between anaphors and their antecedents allows comprehenders to track “who did what to whom”, facilitating construction of an accurate discourse model. Anaphors used in research rarely refer to actual people, objects or events and typically have very minimal semantic detail. In contrast, readers frequently possess substantial information about discourse entities, and recent findings suggest that processing difficulty can arise when potential antecedents are semantically similar. In the current study event-related potentials were recorded as participants read sentences containing ambiguous pronominal anaphors. Such anaphors contain semantic information about the sex of their antecedent, and a P600 effect typically results when they mismatch their antecedents (e.g., “she” referring to a male). As such, sentential pronouns either matched or mismatched their referents. In order to investigate the influence of additional real-world information on coreferential processing, antecedent entities were either semantically “empty” or were known, famous individuals. Mismatching anaphors elicited a P600 effect whose amplitude was significantly greater when sentence characters were real. Moreover, matching pronouns elicited a P600-like effect when their antecedents were fictional. Finally, sentence-final words elicited an N400 effect following referentially failing pronouns relative to those with matching pronouns – but only in "empty" reference conditions. Our results suggest that the presence of high-quality representations in a discourse model facilitates the processing of coherent coreference. |
|
| Thurs., May 20, 2010, 12:30 pm | Tamara Radtcke, U. Glasgow
"The Speech-To-Song Illusion revisited" Abstract: Speech-to-song illusion refers to a perceptual effect (first described by Diana Deutsch in 1995) when a spoken phrase shifts to being heard as sung without changing any acoustic characteristics of the signal. This is achieved by a simple repeating of the phrase several times. This study investigates the boundaries of speech and song from acoustic-perceptual perspective. Using the speech-to-song illusion as a method, we tested rhythmic and tonal hypotheses in order to find out whether acoustic characteristics can cue the perceptual classification of a sentence by German listeners as sung or spoken. First, our results show that, despite individual differences, the speech-to-song illusion is a robust perceptual phenomenon comparable to those known in visual perception. Second, the experiment revealed that acoustic parameters – especially tonal structure – facilitate the perceptual shift from speech to song pointing to an acoustically guided decoding strategy for speech- vs. song-like signals. |
|
| Thurs., May 6, 2010, 12:30 pm | Music Perception and Action research (Yale students and faculty presenting) |
|
| Thurs., April 29, 2010, 12:30 pm | JESSE SNEDEKER (Harvard University): "Fast, Smart, and Out of Control: The Development of Online Language Comprehension" |
|
| Monday, April 12, 2010 | SIMON D. LEVY (Washington & Lee University): "Dynamic Cognition 2010: New Approaches to Some Tough Old Problems" Abstract:In the mid 1980's, cognitive science experienced a revolution in the form of connectionist modeling. Making use of distributed representations and grounded in dynamical systems theory, connectionism aimed to replace the classical symbolic "Words and Rules" framework with something more biologically plausible. After an enormous amount of initial enthusiasm and funding, connectionist modeling fell into disfavor because of (1) the psychologically implausibility and computational intractability of back-propagation, the most popular connectionist learning algorithm; (2) the apparent inability of associative models to capture structural regularities between e.g. semantic meaning and syntactic form and; (3) the difficulty of characterizing connectionist network behavior and representations in traditional statistical language (Bayes' Rule, confidence intervals, etc.) Presentation [Powerpoint.pdf] Presentation [Keynote] |
|
| Thurs., March 25, at 12:30 p.m | INGE-MARIE EIGSTI (University of Connecticut): "Dynamics of Gestures in Autism" | |
| Thurs., March 18, at 12:30 p.m. | YI XU (University College London): "Cracking the Emotion Code in Human Speech" Powerpoint presentation Abstract: It is widely assumed that speech prosody carries emotional information in addition to other, more linguistic information. So far, however, it has been difficult to decipher the emotional code in prosody. Part of the difficulty is due to the widely held assumption that emotional expressions are reflections of one’s internal feelings — a view that has yet to lead to any strong predictive model. Meanwhile, empirical research on vocal emotions has been predominantly data-driven, and the large amounts of data generated also have not led to strong predictive models. In this talk I will explores the idea that emotional expressions are, instead, signals that are evolutionarily engineered to elicit behaviors beneficial to the signaler. A major substantiation of this idea is the bio-informational dimensions theory of emotion encoding, according to which vocal encoding of emotions is done by manipulating vocalization along four bio-informa¬tional dimensions: size projection, dynamicity, audibility and association. Experimental data will be presented in support of the theory. Finally, I will demonstrate that the proposed bio-informational dimensions can be seamlessly incorporated into the PENTA model of speech prosody by allowing emotional meanings to be encoded in parallel with other meanings in speech. Presentation [Powerpoint pdf] Presentation [Keynote] |
|
| Thurs., March 4, at 12:30 p.m. | PAUL MACARUSO (Community College of Rhode Island and Lexia): "Assisting reading development by computer-aided instruction" |
|
| Thurs., Feb. 25, at 12:30 p.m. | LAUREL FAIS (University of British Columbia):
"Looking at looking time: Word-object association in 14-month-old infants" Abstract: |
|
| Thurs., Feb. 11, at 2:00 p.m. Note the unusual time | ROBERT PORT (Indiana University): "Language as a social structure rather than a cognitive one'' Abstract
|
|
| Thurs., Feb. 4, at 12:30 p.m | YANG LEE (Gyeongsang National University, Korea): "Phonological differentiation for assimilated transformation" |
|
| Thurs., Jan. 21, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | TINE MOOSHAMMER (Haskins Laboratories) "An Articulatory Study of Phonological Competition" |
|
| Thurs., Jan. 7, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | KHALIL ISKAROUS (Haskins Laboratories) "Perception of Articulatory Dynamics from Acoustic Signatures" |
|
| Thurs., Dec. 10, 2009 12:30 p.m. | JULIE VAN DYKE, CLINTON JOHNS, and ANUENUE KUKONA: "Individual Differences in Sentence Comprehension: A Retrieval Interference Approach" Abstract: Individual differences in sentence processing are typically explained by appealing to differences in working memory capacity (WMC), as measured by tests of complex memory span. This capacity approach is consistent with models of working memory in which a single, limited pool of resources is available both for processing information and for active maintenance of partial products of processing. Such models predict that individuals with smaller WMC may be disadvantaged during the comprehension of complex sentences because they will be less able to efficiently balance both processes. However, research that has directly measured retrieval speed suggests that the amount of information that can be actively maintained during sentence processing is extremely small, perhaps limited to a single item. Such a view leaves little room for individual variation in the capacity of active memory, and appears to suggest that variation must occur with respect to the retrieval mechanism itself. This account is further supported by recent evidence that readers are vulnerable to retrieval interference. In the current study we evaluated the extent to which readers vary in their sensitivity to retrieval interference. Our findings are consistent with a retrieval approach, where the operation of the retrieval mechanism (and not WMC) is the main explanatory factor. Further analyses of our results in light of other individual difference measures suggest that vocabulary skill—and not WMC—is the most important predictor of individual variation in our dataset. Results are interpreted according to a theory in which the quality of lexical representations determines retrieval success. |
|
| Nov. 17, 2009 12:30 pm |
DONALD SHANKWEILER (Haskins Laboratories) "Building the Supramodal Language Brain" |
|
| Nov. 12, 2009 12:30 pm |
ROBERT FRANK (Yale University) "Statistical learning and mental grammar: Prospects fot a new paradigm?" |
|
| Noiv. 5, 2009 12:30 pm |
JANA BRUNNER (MIT): "Relationship between auditory acuity and the use of motor equivalence in production of the sibilant 'sh' " Abstract Relationship between auditory acuity and the use of motor equivalence in production of the sibilant “sh”. Motor-equivalent trading relations (i.e. different articulations with essentially the same acoustic output) reflect strategies for compensating for perturbations. Previous studies have shown that some speakers use motor equivalence but others do not. In the present study we test the hypothesis that the use of these strategies is linked to the speakers' auditory acuity: Speakers with high auditory acuity will use motor equivalence to a greater extent and concomitantly produce clearer phoneme contrasts than low acuity speakers. In a first experiment, seven speakers were recorded via electromagnetic articulography while adapting over the course of two weeks to an articulatory perturbation consisting of an artificial palate. Motor equivalence in production of the sibilant “sh”, i.e., more lip protrusion when the tongue tip is fronted and less if it is retracted, was found for five of the seven speakers but not for the remaining two. In a second experiment, the speakers' auditory acuity was assessed by testing their ability to hear small differences along a synthetic s-sh continuum. The results indicate that higher-acuity speakers used motor equivalence to a greater extent when adapting to a perturbation than lower-acuity speakers. Additionally, higher-acuity speakers produced greater acoustic contrasts than lower-acuity speakers. Speech rate had an influence on the use of motor equivalence: slow speakers used motor equivalence to a lesser degree than fast speakers. |
|
| Oct. 29, 2009 12:30 pm |
VICTOR KUPERMAN (Stanford University): "Production and Comprehension of Discontinuous Syntactic Dependences" |
|
| Oct. 23, 2009 (Friiday) 12:30 pm |
Xavier Pelorson & Annemie Van Hirtusm Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble "Aeroacoustic Aspects of Voiced Sounds and Fricatives" |
|
| Oct. 15, 2009 12:30 PM |
CLINT JOHNS (Haskins Laboratories): "An ERP investigation of memory accessibility and coreferential processing" Abstract: Coreferential processing is thought to be modulated by an antecedent’s accessibility in a comprehender’s discourse model. Many theories of coreferential processing suggest that an antecedent’s availability as a referent is the result of being in linguistic focus, as when an entity is mentioned first or most frequently in a discourse, or when an entity occupies a prominent position in a sentence’s syntactic structure. However, it may also be possible to enhance an entity’s referential accessibility by virtue of domain-general principles of memory (such as primacy, frequency, or levels-of-processing effects) without appealing to higher-level linguistic operations such as syntactic processing. Because these memory and language effects are typically confounded, the question of whether referential accessibility may be attributed to non-linguistic rather than linguistic processes has never been directly tested. The current study used both event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral measures in a series of experiments in order to investigate the effects of linguistic and non-linguistic focus on coreference. We examined this question against the backdrop of a well-known finding in the coreferential processing literature, the repeated name penalty (Gordon, Grosz, & Gilliom, 1993); this penalty results when an entity that is prominent in a sentence’s syntactic structure is referred to by a repeated name anaphor. By using a generation task (analogous to a levels-of-processing manipulation) we modulated antecedent accessibility without altering the entity’s status in sentence/discourse structure. Experiment 1 showed that, while both generation and syntactic focus improved recognition memory performance, only the syntactic manipulation elicited online discourse processing effects – an N400 effect, the electrophysiological correlate of the repeated name penalty (Swaab, Camblin & Gordon, 2004). When syntactically-enhanced access was removed as a factor in Experiment 2, generation interacted with repetition in the offline recognition memory for antecedent names, while no discourse processing consequences in the ERP waveforms were evident. In Experiment 3, memory enhancement by means of generation and repetition was examined for proper names in word lists. Lexical repetition effects (reduced N400 and increased LPC amplitudes) were found regardless of generation condition; however, repetition and generation elicited different patterns of recognition memory performance. These results suggest that general memory enhancement alone is insufficient to produce discourse processing effects, and that sentence comprehension engages recognition memory processes that can be distinguished from those elicited by word lists. |
|
| Oct. 8, 2009 12:30 PM |
NADINE GAAB (Harvard University): "Neural pre-markers of developmental dyslexia in children prior to reading onset" Abstract: |
|
| October 1, 2009 3:00 PM |
Dr. Malt Joshi, Professor of Reading/Language Arts Education, ESL, and Educational Psychology, Texas A & M, University in the College of Education and Human Development
Talk title TBA |
|
| Sept. 24, 2009 12:30 PM |
SHEILA BLUMSTEIN (Brown University): "Neural Systems Underlying Resolution of Competition in Auditory Word Recognition and Spoken Word Production: Evidence from Lesion and Neuroimaging Investigations" |
|
| Sept. 17, 2009 12:30 PM |
Susan Rvachew (McGill University): "Phonological Processing Skills of Children with Speech Sound Disorders" |
|
| Aug. 6, 2009 12:30 p.m. |
Chun-Hsien Hsu, New York University "EEG studies of Chinese reading: Effects of consistency and neighborhood density" |
|
| July 23, 2009 12:30 p.m. |
Ama Steinlen, University of Kiel, Germany "The Development of Grammatical Comprehension in Bilingual Preschool" |
|
| July 2 12:30 pm |
Prakash Padakannaya, University of Mysore "Reading in Indian orthographies: behavioral and neural studies" |
|
| June 18 12:30 p.m. |
Maria Grigos, New York University "Developmental changes in articulatory kinematics in childhood apraxia of speech" Susie Levi, New York University |
|
| June 16 12:00 p.m |
Jean Mary Zarate, McGill University "Neural correlates of vocal pitch regulation in singing" Abstract: Precise vocal pitch regulation is crucial for prosody in speech and accurate production of notes and melodies in singing. The integration of auditory feedback with the vocal motor system, known as audio-vocal |
|
| June 16 2:00 p.m. |
Cathi Best, Haskins Laboratories and University of Western Sydney "Perceptual assimilation in the native language: Emergent word recognition across dialects" |
|
| June 17 2:00 p.m. |
Matt Huenerfauth, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, City University of New York Queens College and Graduate Center "Generating Animations of American Sign Language Based on Data from Native Signers" |
|
| June 11 12:30 pm | ANDREW WALLACE (Brown University) "Auditory Representation of Vowel Quality" Abstract: |
|
| June 4 12:30 pm |
Miguel Moreno (Trinity College and Haskins Laboratories): "Phonological Constraints on Visual Word Processing in Korean" |
|
| May 28 12:30 pm |
SUE FELSENFELD (Southern Connecticut State University): "Stuttering, Nonfluency, and Attention: What Twins Can Tell Us About These Relationships |
|
| May 27 11:00 am |
Silvia Gennari (The University of York): "Representing actions through language" Abstract |
|
| May 27 2:00 pm |
Gerry Altmann (The University of York): "Keeping (eye)track(s) of multiple worlds" Abstract |
|
| May 21 12:30 pm |
SHELLEY VELLEMAN (University of Massachusetts): "Speech Characteristics of Children with DUP7 syndrome versus Williams syndrome" Abstract: This work focuses on speech development in children with genetic duplication at 7q11.23 ("DUP7"), the same region where deletion results in Williams syndrome ("WS"). Findings include: (1) phonological and apraxia-like motor speech deficits are present in the majority of preschool/school-aged children with DUP7; (2) a comparison of matched pairs of 21- and 24-month-old children with DUP7 versus WS demonstrates reduced volubility and consonant inventories in toddlers with DUP7. |
|
| May 14 12:30 pm | MONIKA MOLNAR (McGill University): "The more you hear, the more you know: Vowel perception in simultaneous bilingual and monolingual speakers of English and French" |
|
| May 7 12:30 pm |
Recent Research from the Music Perception Laboratory Keturah Bixby: "Note Spacing and Tempo Choice In Piano Performance" Robert Goehrke: "Notation Context, and Envelope Effects in the Tritone Paradox" Susan Steinman: "Simultaneous Discrete and Emergent Timing" |
|
| April 30 12:30 PM |
KATHERINE DEMUTH (Brown University) "Investigating the development of phonological and morphological representations" Abstract: |
|
| April 16 12:30 PM |
SUSAN LAMBRECHT SMITH (University of Maine): "A Longitudinal Exploration of Speech Production in Children with Dyslexia" |
|
| March 23, 2:00 | AYUMI SEKI (Tottori University, Japan) "Neuroimaging Studies of Reading and Language Processing in Japanese" |
|
| March 19 12:30 |
CAROL WHITNEY (University of Maryland): "Normal Orthographic Analysis Requires Abnormal Visual Object Processing" |
|
| March 19 2:30 |
JOHN HOGDEN (Los Alamos National Laboratory): "A Blind Algorithm for Recovering Articulator Positions from Acoustics Abstract: |
|
| March 12 12:30 |
Frederick Morrison, (University of Michigan) "Instructional Influence on Growth of Eary Literacy: The Case for Individualization" |
|
| March 5 12:30 pm |
RICHARD McGOWAN (CReSS LLC) "Some Speech Disorders in School-Aged Children Originate as Normal Behavior" (Download Power Point Presentation) |
|
| March 5 2:30 pm |
DON COMPTON, LYNNE FUCHS, and DOUG FUCHS (Vanderbilt University): "Responsiveness-to-Instructions: Exploring Assumptions about Screening, Interventions, and Definitions of Reading Disability" |
|
| March 4 12:30 pm |
WENDY SANDLER (University of Haifa): "The Kernels of Phonology in a New Sign Language" Abstract The property of duality of patterning Ð the existence of two levels of structure, a meaningful level of words and sentences alongside a meaningless level of sounds Ð has been characterized as a basic design feature of human language (Hockett 1960). Some have also argued that a meaningless level, i.e., phonology, must have existed prior to hierarchical syntactic structure in the evolution of language (Pinker & Jackendoff 2005). Sign languages were admitted to the 'bona fide language club' only after Stokoe (1960) demonstrated that they do exhibit duality. But is it possible for a conventionalized language to exist without a fully developed phonological system—without duality? Using evidence from a sign language that has emerged over the past 75 years in a small, insular community, I will show that phonology cannot be taken for granted. The Al-Sayyid Bedouins have a conventionalized language with certain syntactic and morphological regularities (Sandler et al 2005, Aronoff et al 2008), but the language is apparently still in the process of developing a level of structure with discrete meaningless units that behave systematically. In other words, we don't find evidence for a full-blown phonological system in this language. Can a language go on like this? Data from children and from families with several deaf people help to pinpoint emerging regularities and complexity at the level of meaningless formational elements in ABSL. While phonology in language cannot be taken for granted, then, its existence in all older languages, spoken and signed, suggests that it is inevitable. Rather than assume that phonology is somehow 'given' or hard-wired, this work leads us to ask, Why and how does it arise? |
|
| Feb. 26 12:30 pm |
David OSTRY (McGill University and Haskins Laboratories): "Sensory Plasticity and Motor Learning" |
|
| Jan. 22 12:30 pm |
HEMANT TAGARE (Yale University): "Image Analysis: Solutions and Challenges" | |
| Jan. 8 1:00 pm |
YANG LEE (Gyeongsang National University, Korea, and University of Connecticut): "The intrusion of phonology and semantics across two languages: Korean and Chinese" |
|
| Dec. 4 12:30 pm |
JASON SHAW and ADAMANTIOS GAFOS (New York University): "Revisiting the Relation between Linguistic Structure and Temporal Stability" |
|
| Nov. 20 12:30 pm |
MICHAEL COE (Charles J. MacCurdy Professor of Anthropology Emeritus, Yale University, and Curator Emeritus of the Anthropology collection in the Peabody Museum of Natural History): "How the Ancient Maya Wrote" | |
| Nov., 6 2:00 PM |
LASSE BOMBIEN (University of Munich) "Intrinsic and Prosodic Effects on Articulatory Coordination in Initial Consonant Clusters." (download pdf) Download the Presentation in pdf format |
|
| Oct. 23 12:30 AM |
BARBARA JUHASZ (Wesleyan University) "Investigations into Meaning: Age-of-Acquisition Effects and Sensory Experiences with Words" |
|
| Oct. 9 12:30 PM |
JONATHAN PRESTON (Haskins Laboratories): "Phonological processing and speech production in children with speech sound disorders" | |
| Oct. 2 12:30 PM |
NIKKI DAVIS (Vanderbilt University) "Neuroimaging Correlates of Simple Arithmetic Processing in Children" | |
| Sept. 25 12:30 PM |
MICHAEL GROSVALD (University of California, Davis) "An Investigation of Long-Distance Coarticulation in American Sign Language" |
|
| Sept. 11 11:30 PM |
Brown Bag with the President | |
| August 7 12:30 |
DAN MIRMAN (University of Connecticut): "The Nature of Spoken Language Impairments in Aphasia" Abstract: Studying the complex and rapid processing of spoken language in typical and impaired populations requires a sophisticated set of scientific tools. I will describe a combination of experimental, statistical, and computational modeling tools developed for the study of typical spoken language processing and how these tools can be used to study the nature of spoken language impairments in aphasia. The visual world eye-tracking paradigm provides an experimental tool that reveals the precise time course of spoken language processing in a naturalistic and (relatively) simple task. Growth curve analysis provides powerful quantification of fixation time course, including quantification of individual differences. Simulation studies of computational models provide a concrete method for testing theoretical interpretations of the experimental results. When applied to the study of spoken word recognition in aphasia, these techniques suggest an integrated "dynamic balance" theory of Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. |
|
| July 31 12:30 |
F.-XAVIER ALARIO (CNRS & Universitè de Provence, Marseille): "Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Determiner Production" Abstract: Consider for instance the fact that in numerous languages determiner forms depend not only on semantics, but also on several other kinds of information. In Germanic, Slavic, and Romance languages, the retrieval of the determiners (and other closed- class words, such as pronouns) also depends on a property of the nouns called "grammatical gender." For instance, in Dutch, nouns belong to the so-called "neuter" gender or to the "common" gender. The definite determiners accompanying the nouns belonging to the two sets are respectively het (e.g. het huis, 'the house') and de (e.g. de appel, the apple). In English, consonant-initial nouns and vowel-initial noun can require different indefinite article forms (e.g. a pear vs. an apple). Such properties of determiners surely impose constraints on how these lexical items can be retrieved. For this very reason, determiners provide a broad testing ground for contrasting psycholinguistic hypothesis of lexical processing and grammatical encoding. In my talk, I will review the cross-linguistic research I have been conducting on determiner retrieval. One important question that will be asked, and only tentatively answered, concerns the extent to which open-class words such as nouns and closed-class words such as determiners are processed and selected by similar mechanisms. |
|
| July 24 12:30 p.m. |
BRUNO GALANTUCCI (Yeshiva University and Haskins Laboratories). "Links between perception and production: old and new perspectives." | |
| July 17 12:30 p.m. |
ANJANA BHAT (University of Connecticut): "Early markers for developmental delays in young infants" |
|
| June 4, 2:00 PM Haskin | Dragh Sibley, George Mason University "Large-scale modeling of single word reading and recognition". |
|
| July 7, 2:00 PM Haskins |
Brian Byrne, University of New England, Australia, will be visiting the Lab for just one day, Monday, July 7. He will give a talk at 2pm in the large conference room, entitled:
*Early literacy development: Tracking the influences of genes, homes, teachers, schools and countries * Brian is a long-time Haskins collaborator who has been a leader in |
|
| May 15, 11:30 AM Haskins |
Brown Bag with the President | |
| May 8, 12:30 PM Haskins |
Maria Piñango, Yale University Linguistics Broca's Agrammatism: Production, Comprehension and the Architecture of Language Abstract: |
|
| May 1, 12:30 PM Haskins |
Ken Pugh, Haskins Laboratories Town Meeting, Agenda [PDF] |
|
| April 17, 12:30 PM Haskins |
JOSHUA J. DIEHL, Yale Child Study Center and Haskins Laboratories More than words: Prosody processing in high-functioning autism |
|
| April 10, 12:30 PM Haskins |
Three Yale seniors will report research they have done at Haskins Laboratories in collaboration with Bruno Repp.
MEIJIN BRUTTOMESSO: JACKIE THOMPSON: HAITHAM JENDOUBI:
|
|
| April 3, 12:30 PM Haskins |
HOLLY FITCH, University of Connecticut
Animal models of early cortical disruption: possible relevance tso higher-order functional disruptions in humans |
|
March 27, 12:30 PM
|
Ken McRae, University of Western Ontario Psychology Department. Testing An Attractor Network Model of Word Meaning Abstract Over the past several years, we have investigated a number of predictions derived from a distributed attractor network view of word meaning. This view differs substantially from older spreading activation semantic network models. In particular, a theory based on attractor networks entails that people naturally (and implicitly) learn the distributional statistics that are present in their environment, and that this knowledge influences the computation of word meaning. I describe simulations and associated human experiments to make three main points. First, people learn and use information regarding how features of objects are correlated (e.g., things that have four legs also tend to have fur). Second, distinctive features that are strong cues to an object's identity (e.g., if something moos, it's a cow) are computed quickly when people read a concept name (such as "cow"). Third, superordinate concepts such as "fruit" can be learned from experience with basic-level concepts such as "cherry" and "banana" by combining the influence of labeling with knowledge of distributional statistics. Although we use an attractor network model that contains no transparent hierarchical structure, it not only produces emergent behavior that makes it seem as if it has a hierarchical architecture, it also explains data that are inconsistent unless network temporal dynamics are taken into account. |
|
March 28, 4:00PM |
Ken McRae,
University of Western Ontario |
|
| Feb. 28, 12:30 PM | LUCA ONNIS (Cornell University) Variation Sets Facilitate Artificial language Learning Abstract: The positive effects of variation sets in the reported
experiments suggest that learners can reuse the same
learning procedures --- alignment, and comparison ---
at different levels of linguistic structure (here,
lexical and phrasal units). We are presently extending Beyond having implications for understanding the course of L1 acquisition by children, this work contributes to the development of more efficient algorithms for automatic language acquisition, as well as better methods for L2 instruction. |
|
| Feb. 21, 12:30 PM | SUZANNE BOYCE (University of Cincinnati) Changes in Speech Clarity due to Sleep Deprivation |
|
| Feb. 14, 12:30 PM | HUA SHU (Beijing Normal University) An update on reading research in China: Tracking reading development and reading disability |
|
| Jan. 31, 12:30 - 2:30 PM | Athena Vouloumanos (New York University): "Speech as signal for infants"
|
|
| Nov. 1, 12:30 PM | Elliot Saltzman, Hosung Nam, and Louis Goldstein, Haskins Laboratories. (Title to be announced). | |
| Nov. 15, 12:30 - 2:30 PM | Haskins Tech Update. Richard Crane and staff | |
| Oct. 11, 2007 12:30 PM |
Tim Saltuklaroglu (University of Tennessee), Vijaya Guntupalli (East Tennessee State U.), and Joseph Kalinowski (East Carolina University): |
|
| "A double-edged sword: Producing repetitions and prolongations inhibits stuttering and propagates emotional arousal via the mirror system"
Also visiting will be Albert Zhang and Dan Hudock from East Carolina University. (PowerPoint presentation) |
||
| Oct. 4 , 2007 12:30-5:05 PM | Haskins Internal Workshop: Speech Production / Motor Control Group | |
| Sep. 27, 2007 12:30 PM |
Patrice Beddor, University of Michigan. "The phonetics and phonology of nasal gestures" (PowerPoint presentation) | |
| Sep. 20, 2007 1:00 PM |
Karen Livescu, MIT. "Factoring Speech into Linguistic Features" | |
| June 28, 2007 12:30 PM |
Dennis Molfese, University of Louisville. ERPs and Reading Ability. | |
| June 15, 2007 | Piers Messum, University College London. | |
| June 14, 2007 | David Isenberg, Principal Prosultant (sm) of isen.com, LLC. "How one Haskins Post-Doc Learned Phonetics, Got Stupid and Got a Life." | |
| June 7, 2007 12:30 PM |
Jeffrey Runner, University of Rochester. "Structural constraints on the interpretation of elided anaphors." | |
| Apr. 27, 2007 1:00 PM |
Hua Shu (Beijing Normal University). "Reading development in Chinese: An update on behavioral and neurobiological findings" | |
| Apr. 19, 2007 3:00 PM |
Georgije Lukatela (Belgrade, Serbia). "Bi-alphabetical Perceptual Identification: Phonological Mediation in Implicit Memory Priming" | |
| Mar. 29, 2007 2:00 PM |
Khalil Iskarous, Haskins Laboratories. "Recovering Place of Articulation from the Speech Signal" | |
| Mar. 8, 2007 2:00 PM |
Robert E. Remez, Barnard College, Columbia University. "The sound of your 'Hello!' The role of phonetic sensitivity in the perceptual identification of talkers." | |
| Mar. 8, 2007 11:00 AM |
Dominic Massaro, University of California, Santa Cruz. "Talking Faces: Technology, Research, and Applications." | |
| Mar. 1, 2007 2:00 PM |
Leo Blomert, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. "At the Roots of Literacy: fMRI and ERP Studies of Grapheme-Phoneme Integration." | |
| Feb. 22, 2006 2:00 PM |
Takayuki Ito, Haskins Laboratories. "Contributions of Cutaneous Afferent Information in Speech." | |
| Feb. 15, 2006 2:00 PM |
Dan Mirman, University of Connecticut and Haskins Laboratories. "Interactive Processing in Speech Comprehension." | |
| Dec. 7, 2006 12:30 PM |
Michael Goldstein. Cornell University.
"Learning by Babbling: Social Mechanisms of Prelinguistic Vocal Development." |
|
| Nov. 30, 2006 12:30 PM |
Jeremy Skipper. Rutgers University, Newark.
"Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception." |
|
| Nov. 16, 2006 12:30 PM |
Michael Tyler | |
| Nov. 9, 2006 12:30 PM |
Gerald McRoberts. Haskins Laboratories. "Infants' Perception of Repeated Patterns in Speech and the Discovery of Language Structure" |
|
| Nov. 2, 2006 12:30 PM |
Reiner Wilhelms-Tricarico. From Muscle Models to Tongue Models. (Presentation in PDF format.) |
|
| Oct. 26, 2006 12:30 PM |
Len Katz. Two statistical issues journal editors are concerned about: |
|
| Oct. 19, 2006 12:30 PM |
Fermin Moscoso Del Prado Martin. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. A sketch of an information-theoretical approach to lexical processing. |
|
| Sep. 15, 2006 10:30 AM |
Bernd J. Kröger, University of Aachen. Modeling sensory-to-motor mappings using neural nets and a 3D articulatory speech synthesizer. | |
| June 29, 2006 12:30 PM |
Douglas Whalen — Progress Report on Project 2 of the A-40 Grant: Neurobiological Foundations of Speech | |
| June 22, 2006 12:30 PM |
Iris Berent — What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from Perceptual illusions Abstract | |
| June 15, 2006 12:30 PM |
David Braze — Skill-related Differences in the Online Reading Behavior of Young Adults | |
| June 1, 2006 12:30 p.m |
Anna Barney (University of Southampton)— The Effect of Glottal Opening on the Acoustic Response of the Vocal Tract. (PowerPoint presentation) |
|
| May 25, 2006 12:30 PM |
Carol Fowler will provide a Progress Report on Project 1 of the A40 Grant: Developing the Theory of Phonological Practice |
|
| May 18, 2006 12:30 PM |
Michael Turvey - Progress Report on Project 6 of the A40 Grant: Rapid Componential Processing in Visual Word Identification at Phonological and Morphological Levels | |
| May 11, 2006 12:30 PM |
Elana Golumbic (Hebrew University) - Oscillatory neural activity - a window into higher cognitive processes? Evidence from face perception and word recognition | |
| May 4, 2006 | Ken Pugh—Progress Report on A40 Project 4: Neurobiological Mechanisms for Word Recognition | |
| Apr. 27, 2006 | Derek Lyons Illusions of Causality: An Exploration of the Overimitation Effect |
|
| Apr. 6, 2006 | Haskins Discovery Day Five-minute presentations on discoveries made in the new building were presented by Doug Whalen, Bruno Repp, Gaurav Mathur, Martha Tyrone, Diane Lillo-Martin, Julia Irwin, Gerry McRoberts, Dave Braze, Mark Tiede, Laura Koenig, Jay Rueckl, Laurie Feldman, Michael Turvey, and Einar Mencl. Afterwards there was a celebration of the funding of A75, A93 and A108 |
|
| Mar. 30, 2006 | Aby Cohn, Cornell University Linguistics Department. "Levels of abstractness in phonology and the lexicon: evidence from English homophones" | |
| Mar. 23, 2006 | Susan Nittrouer, Ohio State University "Discovering the Linguistically Relevant Structure of the Speech Signal: What Hearing and Deaf Children Must Do and How They Do It" |
|
| Mar. 16, 2006 | Anders Löfqvist | |
| Feb. 23, 2006 | Jay Dixon | |
| Feb. 2, 2006 | Keith R. Kluender |

