RESEARCH
PEOPLE
PUBLICATIONS
GIVING


UNDERSTANDING SPEECH
READING
SPEECH TECHNOLOGY
| Thurs., Feb. 4, at 12:30 p.m | YANG LEE (Gyeongsang National University, Korea): "Phonological differentiation for assimilated transformation" |
|
| Thurs., Jan. 21, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | TINE MOOSHAMMER (Haskins Laboratories) "An Articulatory Study of Phonological Competition" |
|
| Thurs., Jan. 7, 2010, 12:30 p.m. | KHALIL ISKAROUS (Haskins Laboratories) "Perception of Articulatory Dynamics from Acoustic Signatures" |
|
| Thurs., Dec. 10, 2009 12:30 p.m. | JULIE VAN DYKE, CLINTON JOHNS, and ANUENUE KUKONA: "Individual Differences in Sentence Comprehension: A Retrieval Interference Approach" Abstract: Individual differences in sentence processing are typically explained by appealing to differences in working memory capacity (WMC), as measured by tests of complex memory span. This capacity approach is consistent with models of working memory in which a single, limited pool of resources is available both for processing information and for active maintenance of partial products of processing. Such models predict that individuals with smaller WMC may be disadvantaged during the comprehension of complex sentences because they will be less able to efficiently balance both processes. However, research that has directly measured retrieval speed suggests that the amount of information that can be actively maintained during sentence processing is extremely small, perhaps limited to a single item. Such a view leaves little room for individual variation in the capacity of active memory, and appears to suggest that variation must occur with respect to the retrieval mechanism itself. This account is further supported by recent evidence that readers are vulnerable to retrieval interference. In the current study we evaluated the extent to which readers vary in their sensitivity to retrieval interference. Our findings are consistent with a retrieval approach, where the operation of the retrieval mechanism (and not WMC) is the main explanatory factor. Further analyses of our results in light of other individual difference measures suggest that vocabulary skill—and not WMC—is the most important predictor of individual variation in our dataset. Results are interpreted according to a theory in which the quality of lexical representations determines retrieval success. |
|
| Nov. 17, 2009 12:30 pm |
DONALD SHANKWEILER (Haskins Laboratories) "Building the Supramodal Language Brain" |
|
| Nov. 12, 2009 12:30 pm |
ROBERT FRANK (Yale University) "Statistical learning and mental grammar: Prospects fot a new paradigm?" |
|
| Noiv. 5, 2009 12:30 pm |
JANA BRUNNER (MIT): "Relationship between auditory acuity and the use of motor equivalence in production of the sibilant 'sh' " Abstract Relationship between auditory acuity and the use of motor equivalence in production of the sibilant “sh”. Motor-equivalent trading relations (i.e. different articulations with essentially the same acoustic output) reflect strategies for compensating for perturbations. Previous studies have shown that some speakers use motor equivalence but others do not. In the present study we test the hypothesis that the use of these strategies is linked to the speakers' auditory acuity: Speakers with high auditory acuity will use motor equivalence to a greater extent and concomitantly produce clearer phoneme contrasts than low acuity speakers. In a first experiment, seven speakers were recorded via electromagnetic articulography while adapting over the course of two weeks to an articulatory perturbation consisting of an artificial palate. Motor equivalence in production of the sibilant “sh”, i.e., more lip protrusion when the tongue tip is fronted and less if it is retracted, was found for five of the seven speakers but not for the remaining two. In a second experiment, the speakers' auditory acuity was assessed by testing their ability to hear small differences along a synthetic s-sh continuum. The results indicate that higher-acuity speakers used motor equivalence to a greater extent when adapting to a perturbation than lower-acuity speakers. Additionally, higher-acuity speakers produced greater acoustic contrasts than lower-acuity speakers. Speech rate had an influence on the use of motor equivalence: slow speakers used motor equivalence to a lesser degree than fast speakers. |
|
| Oct. 29, 2009 12:30 pm |
VICTOR KUPERMAN (Stanford University): "Production and Comprehension of Discontinuous Syntactic Dependences" |
|
| Oct. 23, 2009 (Friiday) 12:30 pm |
Xavier Pelorson & Annemie Van Hirtusm Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble "Aeroacoustic Aspects of Voiced Sounds and Fricatives" |
|
| Oct. 15, 2009 12:30 PM |
CLINT JOHNS (Haskins Laboratories): "An ERP investigation of memory accessibility and coreferential processing" Abstract: Coreferential processing is thought to be modulated by an antecedent’s accessibility in a comprehender’s discourse model. Many theories of coreferential processing suggest that an antecedent’s availability as a referent is the result of being in linguistic focus, as when an entity is mentioned first or most frequently in a discourse, or when an entity occupies a prominent position in a sentence’s syntactic structure. However, it may also be possible to enhance an entity’s referential accessibility by virtue of domain-general principles of memory (such as primacy, frequency, or levels-of-processing effects) without appealing to higher-level linguistic operations such as syntactic processing. Because these memory and language effects are typically confounded, the question of whether referential accessibility may be attributed to non-linguistic rather than linguistic processes has never been directly tested. The current study used both event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral measures in a series of experiments in order to investigate the effects of linguistic and non-linguistic focus on coreference. We examined this question against the backdrop of a well-known finding in the coreferential processing literature, the repeated name penalty (Gordon, Grosz, & Gilliom, 1993); this penalty results when an entity that is prominent in a sentence’s syntactic structure is referred to by a repeated name anaphor. By using a generation task (analogous to a levels-of-processing manipulation) we modulated antecedent accessibility without altering the entity’s status in sentence/discourse structure. Experiment 1 showed that, while both generation and syntactic focus improved recognition memory performance, only the syntactic manipulation elicited online discourse processing effects – an N400 effect, the electrophysiological correlate of the repeated name penalty (Swaab, Camblin & Gordon, 2004). When syntactically-enhanced access was removed as a factor in Experiment 2, generation interacted with repetition in the offline recognition memory for antecedent names, while no discourse processing consequences in the ERP waveforms were evident. In Experiment 3, memory enhancement by means of generation and repetition was examined for proper names in word lists. Lexical repetition effects (reduced N400 and increased LPC amplitudes) were found regardless of generation condition; however, repetition and generation elicited different patterns of recognition memory performance. These results suggest that general memory enhancement alone is insufficient to produce discourse processing effects, and that sentence comprehension engages recognition memory processes that can be distinguished from those elicited by word lists. |
|
| Oct. 8, 2009 12:30 PM |
NADINE GAAB (Harvard University): "Neural pre-markers of developmental dyslexia in children prior to reading onset" Abstract: |
|
| October 1, 2009 3:00 PM |
Dr. Malt Joshi, Professor of Reading/Language Arts Education, ESL, and Educational Psychology, Texas A & M, University in the College of Education and Human Development
Talk title TBA |
|
| Sept. 24, 2009 12:30 PM |
SHEILA BLUMSTEIN (Brown University): "Neural Systems Underlying Resolution of Competition in Auditory Word Recognition and Spoken Word Production: Evidence from Lesion and Neuroimaging Investigations" |
|
| Sept. 17, 2009 12:30 PM |
Susan Rvachew (McGill University): "Phonological Processing Skills of Children with Speech Sound Disorders" |
|
| Aug. 6, 2009 12:30 p.m. |
Chun-Hsien Hsu, New York University "EEG studies of Chinese reading: Effects of consistency and neighborhood density" |
|
| July 23, 2009 12:30 p.m. |
Ama Steinlen, University of Kiel, Germany "The Development of Grammatical Comprehension in Bilingual Preschool" |
|
| July 2 12:30 pm |
Prakash Padakannaya, University of Mysore "Reading in Indian orthographies: behavioral and neural studies" |
|
| June 18 12:30 p.m. |
Maria Grigos, New York University "Developmental changes in articulatory kinematics in childhood apraxia of speech" Susie Levi, New York University |
|
| June 16 12:00 p.m |
Jean Mary Zarate, McGill University "Neural correlates of vocal pitch regulation in singing" Abstract: Precise vocal pitch regulation is crucial for prosody in speech and accurate production of notes and melodies in singing. The integration of auditory feedback with the vocal motor system, known as audio-vocal |
|
| June 16 2:00 p.m. |
Cathi Best, Haskins Laboratories and University of Western Sydney "Perceptual assimilation in the native language: Emergent word recognition across dialects" |
|
| June 17 2:00 p.m. |
Matt Huenerfauth, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, City University of New York Queens College and Graduate Center "Generating Animations of American Sign Language Based on Data from Native Signers" |
|
| June 11 12:30 pm | ANDREW WALLACE (Brown University) "Auditory Representation of Vowel Quality" Abstract: |
|
| June 4 12:30 pm |
Miguel Moreno (Trinity College and Haskins Laboratories): "Phonological Constraints on Visual Word Processing in Korean" |
|
| May 28 12:30 pm |
SUE FELSENFELD (Southern Connecticut State University): "Stuttering, Nonfluency, and Attention: What Twins Can Tell Us About These Relationships |
|
| May 27 11:00 am |
Silvia Gennari (The University of York): "Representing actions through language" Abstract |
|
| May 27 2:00 pm |
Gerry Altmann (The University of York): "Keeping (eye)track(s) of multiple worlds" Abstract |
|
| May 21 12:30 pm |
SHELLEY VELLEMAN (University of Massachusetts): "Speech Characteristics of Children with DUP7 syndrome versus Williams syndrome" Abstract: This work focuses on speech development in children with genetic duplication at 7q11.23 ("DUP7"), the same region where deletion results in Williams syndrome ("WS"). Findings include: (1) phonological and apraxia-like motor speech deficits are present in the majority of preschool/school-aged children with DUP7; (2) a comparison of matched pairs of 21- and 24-month-old children with DUP7 versus WS demonstrates reduced volubility and consonant inventories in toddlers with DUP7. |
|
| May 14 12:30 pm | MONIKA MOLNAR (McGill University): "The more you hear, the more you know: Vowel perception in simultaneous bilingual and monolingual speakers of English and French" |
|
| May 7 12:30 pm |
Recent Research from the Music Perception Laboratory Keturah Bixby: "Note Spacing and Tempo Choice In Piano Performance" Robert Goehrke: "Notation Context, and Envelope Effects in the Tritone Paradox" Susan Steinman: "Simultaneous Discrete and Emergent Timing" |
|
| April 30 12:30 PM |
KATHERINE DEMUTH (Brown University) "Investigating the development of phonological and morphological representations" Abstract: |
|
| April 16 12:30 PM |
SUSAN LAMBRECHT SMITH (University of Maine): "A Longitudinal Exploration of Speech Production in Children with Dyslexia" |
|
| March 23, 2:00 | AYUMI SEKI (Tottori University, Japan) "Neuroimaging Studies of Reading and Language Processing in Japanese" |
|
| March 19 12:30 |
CAROL WHITNEY (University of Maryland): "Normal Orthographic Analysis Requires Abnormal Visual Object Processing" |
|
| March 19 2:30 |
JOHN HOGDEN (Los Alamos National Laboratory): "A Blind Algorithm for Recovering Articulator Positions from Acoustics Abstract: |
|
| March 12 12:30 |
Frederick Morrison, (University of Michigan) "Instructional Influence on Growth of Eary Literacy: The Case for Individualization" |
|
| March 5 12:30 pm |
RICHARD McGOWAN (CReSS LLC) "Some Speech Disorders in School-Aged Children Originate as Normal Behavior" (Download Power Point Presentation) |
|
| March 5 2:30 pm |
DON COMPTON, LYNNE FUCHS, and DOUG FUCHS (Vanderbilt University): "Responsiveness-to-Instructions: Exploring Assumptions about Screening, Interventions, and Definitions of Reading Disability" |
|
| March 4 12:30 pm |
WENDY SANDLER (University of Haifa): "The Kernels of Phonology in a New Sign Language" Abstract The property of duality of patterning Ð the existence of two levels of structure, a meaningful level of words and sentences alongside a meaningless level of sounds Ð has been characterized as a basic design feature of human language (Hockett 1960). Some have also argued that a meaningless level, i.e., phonology, must have existed prior to hierarchical syntactic structure in the evolution of language (Pinker & Jackendoff 2005). Sign languages were admitted to the 'bona fide language club' only after Stokoe (1960) demonstrated that they do exhibit duality. But is it possible for a conventionalized language to exist without a fully developed phonological system—without duality? Using evidence from a sign language that has emerged over the past 75 years in a small, insular community, I will show that phonology cannot be taken for granted. The Al-Sayyid Bedouins have a conventionalized language with certain syntactic and morphological regularities (Sandler et al 2005, Aronoff et al 2008), but the language is apparently still in the process of developing a level of structure with discrete meaningless units that behave systematically. In other words, we don't find evidence for a full-blown phonological system in this language. Can a language go on like this? Data from children and from families with several deaf people help to pinpoint emerging regularities and complexity at the level of meaningless formational elements in ABSL. While phonology in language cannot be taken for granted, then, its existence in all older languages, spoken and signed, suggests that it is inevitable. Rather than assume that phonology is somehow 'given' or hard-wired, this work leads us to ask, Why and how does it arise? |
|
| Feb. 26 12:30 pm |
David OSTRY (McGill University and Haskins Laboratories): "Sensory Plasticity and Motor Learning" |
|
| Jan. 22 12:30 pm |
HEMANT TAGARE (Yale University): "Image Analysis: Solutions and Challenges" | |
| Jan. 8 1:00 pm |
YANG LEE (Gyeongsang National University, Korea, and University of Connecticut): "The intrusion of phonology and semantics across two languages: Korean and Chinese" |
|
| Dec. 4 12:30 pm |
JASON SHAW and ADAMANTIOS GAFOS (New York University): "Revisiting the Relation between Linguistic Structure and Temporal Stability" |
|
| Nov. 20 12:30 pm |
MICHAEL COE (Charles J. MacCurdy Professor of Anthropology Emeritus, Yale University, and Curator Emeritus of the Anthropology collection in the Peabody Museum of Natural History): "How the Ancient Maya Wrote" | |
| Nov., 6 2:00 PM |
LASSE BOMBIEN (University of Munich) "Intrinsic and Prosodic Effects on Articulatory Coordination in Initial Consonant Clusters." (download pdf) Download the Presentation in pdf format |
|
| Oct. 23 12:30 AM |
BARBARA JUHASZ (Wesleyan University) "Investigations into Meaning: Age-of-Acquisition Effects and Sensory Experiences with Words" |
|
| Oct. 9 12:30 PM |
JONATHAN PRESTON (Haskins Laboratories): "Phonological processing and speech production in children with speech sound disorders" | |
| Oct. 2 12:30 PM |
NIKKI DAVIS (Vanderbilt University) "Neuroimaging Correlates of Simple Arithmetic Processing in Children" | |
| Sept. 25 12:30 PM |
MICHAEL GROSVALD (University of California, Davis) "An Investigation of Long-Distance Coarticulation in American Sign Language" |
|
| Sept. 11 11:30 PM |
Brown Bag with the President | |
| August 7 12:30 |
DAN MIRMAN (University of Connecticut): "The Nature of Spoken Language Impairments in Aphasia" Abstract: Studying the complex and rapid processing of spoken language in typical and impaired populations requires a sophisticated set of scientific tools. I will describe a combination of experimental, statistical, and computational modeling tools developed for the study of typical spoken language processing and how these tools can be used to study the nature of spoken language impairments in aphasia. The visual world eye-tracking paradigm provides an experimental tool that reveals the precise time course of spoken language processing in a naturalistic and (relatively) simple task. Growth curve analysis provides powerful quantification of fixation time course, including quantification of individual differences. Simulation studies of computational models provide a concrete method for testing theoretical interpretations of the experimental results. When applied to the study of spoken word recognition in aphasia, these techniques suggest an integrated "dynamic balance" theory of Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. |
|
| July 31 12:30 |
F.-XAVIER ALARIO (CNRS & Universitè de Provence, Marseille): "Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Determiner Production" Abstract: Consider for instance the fact that in numerous languages determiner forms depend not only on semantics, but also on several other kinds of information. In Germanic, Slavic, and Romance languages, the retrieval of the determiners (and other closed- class words, such as pronouns) also depends on a property of the nouns called "grammatical gender." For instance, in Dutch, nouns belong to the so-called "neuter" gender or to the "common" gender. The definite determiners accompanying the nouns belonging to the two sets are respectively het (e.g. het huis, 'the house') and de (e.g. de appel, the apple). In English, consonant-initial nouns and vowel-initial noun can require different indefinite article forms (e.g. a pear vs. an apple). Such properties of determiners surely impose constraints on how these lexical items can be retrieved. For this very reason, determiners provide a broad testing ground for contrasting psycholinguistic hypothesis of lexical processing and grammatical encoding. In my talk, I will review the cross-linguistic research I have been conducting on determiner retrieval. One important question that will be asked, and only tentatively answered, concerns the extent to which open-class words such as nouns and closed-class words such as determiners are processed and selected by similar mechanisms. |
|
| July 24 12:30 p.m. |
BRUNO GALANTUCCI (Yeshiva University and Haskins Laboratories). "Links between perception and production: old and new perspectives." | |
| July 17 12:30 p.m. |
ANJANA BHAT (University of Connecticut): "Early markers for developmental delays in young infants" |
|
| June 4, 2:00 PM Haskin | Dragh Sibley, George Mason University "Large-scale modeling of single word reading and recognition". |
|
| July 7, 2:00 PM Haskins |
Brian Byrne, University of New England, Australia, will be visiting the Lab for just one day, Monday, July 7. He will give a talk at 2pm in the large conference room, entitled:
*Early literacy development: Tracking the influences of genes, homes, teachers, schools and countries * Brian is a long-time Haskins collaborator who has been a leader in |
|
| May 15, 11:30 AM Haskins |
Brown Bag with the President | |
| May 8, 12:30 PM Haskins |
Maria Piñango, Yale University Linguistics Broca's Agrammatism: Production, Comprehension and the Architecture of Language Abstract: |
|
| May 1, 12:30 PM Haskins |
Ken Pugh, Haskins Laboratories Town Meeting, Agenda [PDF] |
|
| April 17, 12:30 PM Haskins |
JOSHUA J. DIEHL, Yale Child Study Center and Haskins Laboratories More than words: Prosody processing in high-functioning autism |
|
| April 10, 12:30 PM Haskins |
Three Yale seniors will report research they have done at Haskins Laboratories in collaboration with Bruno Repp.
MEIJIN BRUTTOMESSO: JACKIE THOMPSON: HAITHAM JENDOUBI:
|
|
| April 3, 12:30 PM Haskins |
HOLLY FITCH, University of Connecticut
Animal models of early cortical disruption: possible relevance tso higher-order functional disruptions in humans |
|
March 27, 12:30 PM
|
Ken McRae, University of Western Ontario Psychology Department. Testing An Attractor Network Model of Word Meaning Abstract Over the past several years, we have investigated a number of predictions derived from a distributed attractor network view of word meaning. This view differs substantially from older spreading activation semantic network models. In particular, a theory based on attractor networks entails that people naturally (and implicitly) learn the distributional statistics that are present in their environment, and that this knowledge influences the computation of word meaning. I describe simulations and associated human experiments to make three main points. First, people learn and use information regarding how features of objects are correlated (e.g., things that have four legs also tend to have fur). Second, distinctive features that are strong cues to an object's identity (e.g., if something moos, it's a cow) are computed quickly when people read a concept name (such as "cow"). Third, superordinate concepts such as "fruit" can be learned from experience with basic-level concepts such as "cherry" and "banana" by combining the influence of labeling with knowledge of distributional statistics. Although we use an attractor network model that contains no transparent hierarchical structure, it not only produces emergent behavior that makes it seem as if it has a hierarchical architecture, it also explains data that are inconsistent unless network temporal dynamics are taken into account. |
|
March 28, 4:00PM |
Ken McRae,
University of Western Ontario |
|
| Feb. 28, 12:30 PM | LUCA ONNIS (Cornell University) Variation Sets Facilitate Artificial language Learning Abstract: The positive effects of variation sets in the reported
experiments suggest that learners can reuse the same
learning procedures --- alignment, and comparison ---
at different levels of linguistic structure (here,
lexical and phrasal units). We are presently extending Beyond having implications for understanding the course of L1 acquisition by children, this work contributes to the development of more efficient algorithms for automatic language acquisition, as well as better methods for L2 instruction. |
|
| Feb. 21, 12:30 PM | SUZANNE BOYCE (University of Cincinnati) Changes in Speech Clarity due to Sleep Deprivation |
|
| Feb. 14, 12:30 PM | HUA SHU (Beijing Normal University) An update on reading research in China: Tracking reading development and reading disability |
|
| Jan. 31, 12:30 - 2:30 PM | Athena Vouloumanos (New York University): "Speech as signal for infants"
|
|
| Nov. 1, 12:30 PM | Elliot Saltzman, Hosung Nam, and Louis Goldstein, Haskins Laboratories. (Title to be announced). | |
| Nov. 15, 12:30 - 2:30 PM | Haskins Tech Update. Richard Crane and staff | |
| Oct. 11, 2007 12:30 PM |
Tim Saltuklaroglu (University of Tennessee), Vijaya Guntupalli (East Tennessee State U.), and Joseph Kalinowski (East Carolina University): |
|
| "A double-edged sword: Producing repetitions and prolongations inhibits stuttering and propagates emotional arousal via the mirror system"
Also visiting will be Albert Zhang and Dan Hudock from East Carolina University. (PowerPoint presentation) |
||
| Oct. 4 , 2007 12:30-5:05 PM | Haskins Internal Workshop: Speech Production / Motor Control Group | |
| Sep. 27, 2007 12:30 PM |
Patrice Beddor, University of Michigan. "The phonetics and phonology of nasal gestures" (PowerPoint presentation) | |
| Sep. 20, 2007 1:00 PM |
Karen Livescu, MIT. "Factoring Speech into Linguistic Features" | |
| June 28, 2007 12:30 PM |
Dennis Molfese, University of Louisville. ERPs and Reading Ability. | |
| June 15, 2007 | Piers Messum, University College London. | |
| June 14, 2007 | David Isenberg, Principal Prosultant (sm) of isen.com, LLC. "How one Haskins Post-Doc Learned Phonetics, Got Stupid and Got a Life." | |
| June 7, 2007 12:30 PM |
Jeffrey Runner, University of Rochester. "Structural constraints on the interpretation of elided anaphors." | |
| Apr. 27, 2007 1:00 PM |
Hua Shu (Beijing Normal University). "Reading development in Chinese: An update on behavioral and neurobiological findings" | |
| Apr. 19, 2007 3:00 PM |
Georgije Lukatela (Belgrade, Serbia). "Bi-alphabetical Perceptual Identification: Phonological Mediation in Implicit Memory Priming" | |
| Mar. 29, 2007 2:00 PM |
Khalil Iskarous, Haskins Laboratories. "Recovering Place of Articulation from the Speech Signal" | |
| Mar. 8, 2007 2:00 PM |
Robert E. Remez, Barnard College, Columbia University. "The sound of your 'Hello!' The role of phonetic sensitivity in the perceptual identification of talkers." | |
| Mar. 8, 2007 11:00 AM |
Dominic Massaro, University of California, Santa Cruz. "Talking Faces: Technology, Research, and Applications." | |
| Mar. 1, 2007 2:00 PM |
Leo Blomert, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. "At the Roots of Literacy: fMRI and ERP Studies of Grapheme-Phoneme Integration." | |
| Feb. 22, 2006 2:00 PM |
Takayuki Ito, Haskins Laboratories. "Contributions of Cutaneous Afferent Information in Speech." | |
| Feb. 15, 2006 2:00 PM |
Dan Mirman, University of Connecticut and Haskins Laboratories. "Interactive Processing in Speech Comprehension." | |
| Dec. 7, 2006 12:30 PM |
Michael Goldstein. Cornell University.
"Learning by Babbling: Social Mechanisms of Prelinguistic Vocal Development." |
|
| Nov. 30, 2006 12:30 PM |
Jeremy Skipper. Rutgers University, Newark.
"Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception." |
|
| Nov. 16, 2006 12:30 PM |
Michael Tyler | |
| Nov. 9, 2006 12:30 PM |
Gerald McRoberts. Haskins Laboratories. "Infants' Perception of Repeated Patterns in Speech and the Discovery of Language Structure" |
|
| Nov. 2, 2006 12:30 PM |
Reiner Wilhelms-Tricarico. From Muscle Models to Tongue Models. (Presentation in PDF format.) |
|
| Oct. 26, 2006 12:30 PM |
Len Katz. Two statistical issues journal editors are concerned about: |
|
| Oct. 19, 2006 12:30 PM |
Fermin Moscoso Del Prado Martin. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. A sketch of an information-theoretical approach to lexical processing. |
|
| Sep. 15, 2006 10:30 AM |
Bernd J. Kröger, University of Aachen. Modeling sensory-to-motor mappings using neural nets and a 3D articulatory speech synthesizer. | |
| June 29, 2006 12:30 PM |
Douglas Whalen — Progress Report on Project 2 of the A-40 Grant: Neurobiological Foundations of Speech | |
| June 22, 2006 12:30 PM |
Iris Berent — What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from Perceptual illusions Abstract | |
| June 15, 2006 12:30 PM |
David Braze — Skill-related Differences in the Online Reading Behavior of Young Adults | |
| June 1, 2006 12:30 p.m |
Anna Barney (University of Southampton)— The Effect of Glottal Opening on the Acoustic Response of the Vocal Tract. (PowerPoint presentation) |
|
| May 25, 2006 12:30 PM |
Carol Fowler will provide a Progress Report on Project 1 of the A40 Grant: Developing the Theory of Phonological Practice |
|
| May 18, 2006 12:30 PM |
Michael Turvey - Progress Report on Project 6 of the A40 Grant: Rapid Componential Processing in Visual Word Identification at Phonological and Morphological Levels | |
| May 11, 2006 12:30 PM |
Elana Golumbic (Hebrew University) - Oscillatory neural activity - a window into higher cognitive processes? Evidence from face perception and word recognition | |
| May 4, 2006 | Ken Pugh—Progress Report on A40 Project 4: Neurobiological Mechanisms for Word Recognition | |
| Apr. 27, 2006 | Derek Lyons Illusions of Causality: An Exploration of the Overimitation Effect |
|
| Apr. 6, 2006 | Haskins Discovery Day Five-minute presentations on discoveries made in the new building were presented by Doug Whalen, Bruno Repp, Gaurav Mathur, Martha Tyrone, Diane Lillo-Martin, Julia Irwin, Gerry McRoberts, Dave Braze, Mark Tiede, Laura Koenig, Jay Rueckl, Laurie Feldman, Michael Turvey, and Einar Mencl. Afterwards there was a celebration of the funding of A75, A93 and A108 |
|
| Mar. 30, 2006 | Aby Cohn, Cornell University Linguistics Department. "Levels of abstractness in phonology and the lexicon: evidence from English homophones" | |
| Mar. 23, 2006 | Susan Nittrouer, Ohio State University "Discovering the Linguistically Relevant Structure of the Speech Signal: What Hearing and Deaf Children Must Do and How They Do It" |
|
| Mar. 16, 2006 | Anders Löfqvist | |
| Feb. 23, 2006 | Jay Dixon | |
| Feb. 2, 2006 | Keith R. Kluender |

